Sort Output List by Search Value

Consider the following input:

ClearAll[dice, sides];
dice := 3
sides := 6
CountsBy[Times @@@ Tuples[Range[1, sides], dice], {1, sides^dice}]

This gives the output

<|{1,216}\[InvisibleApplication](1)->1,
{1,216}\[InvisibleApplication](2)->3,
{1,216}\[InvisibleApplication](3)->3,
{1,216}\[InvisibleApplication](4)->6,
{1,216}\[InvisibleApplication](5)->3,
{1,216}\[InvisibleApplication](6)->9,
{1,216}\[InvisibleApplication](8)->7,
{1,216}\[InvisibleApplication](10)->6,
{1,216}\[InvisibleApplication](12)->15,
{1,216}\[InvisibleApplication](9)->3,
{1,216}\[InvisibleApplication](15)->6,
...

That is acceptable but I would like the output to be sorted after the values that I multiply, i.e., I would like the number of times the product is 9 to be printed between the number of times the product is 8 and the number of times the product is 10. That is, I would like the output to be

<|{1,216}\[InvisibleApplication](1)->1,
{1,216}\[InvisibleApplication](2)->3,
{1,216}\[InvisibleApplication](3)->3,
{1,216}\[InvisibleApplication](4)->6,
{1,216}\[InvisibleApplication](5)->3,
{1,216}\[InvisibleApplication](6)->9,
{1,216}\[InvisibleApplication](8)->7,
{1,216}\[InvisibleApplication](9)->3,
{1,216}\[InvisibleApplication](10)->6,
{1,216}\[InvisibleApplication](12)->15,
{1,216}\[InvisibleApplication](15)->6,
...

but how do I get this?

P.S. The "problem" occures several times later in the output list, too.

If you have those entries sorted then the result will be sorted too:

CountsBy[
Sort[Times @@@ Tuples[Range[1, sides], dice]]
, {1, sides^dice}
]

but the fastest would probably be just a KeySort:

KeySort @ CountsBy[
Times @@@ Tuples[Range[1, sides], dice]
, {1, sides^dice}
]

I personally prefer @Kuba's method of KeySort. You can always use Normalthen SortBy and then Association

ClearAll[dice, sides];
dice := 3
sides := 6
<| SortBy[First]@Normal@CountsBy[
Times @@@ Tuples[Range[1, sides], dice], {1, sides^dice}] |>
• You know you can express your preferences by upvoting answers :) – Kuba Mar 20 '17 at 18:59
• @Kuba +1 for the comment :) – Ali Hashmi Mar 20 '17 at 19:03