17
$\begingroup$

Are there books or tutorials that walk one through creating a professional publication quality notebook?

For example, I would like to create a two column article using an IEEE format. Is this possible?

Cross-link to Wolfram Community post

Related Math Stack Exchange post

$\endgroup$

closed as off-topic by rhermans, MarcoB, J. M. will be back soon Aug 24 '17 at 17:47

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "The question is out of scope for this site. The answer to this question requires either advice from Wolfram support or the services of a professional consultant." – rhermans, J. M. will be back soon
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 14
    $\begingroup$ Please don't. It will save you a lot of headaches. Yes, you can create nice documents with reference in Mathematica, but it is just not comparable to e.g. LaTeX documents. Why don't you go to ShareLaTeX and create an IEEE article and start writing? $\endgroup$ – halirutan Jan 28 '17 at 15:38
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ Reluctantly, I have to agree that this will be more headache than it is worth. What I do is write up in Mathematica using one of the article styles, then Save as > LaTeX and do further processing in a text editor, after adding the appropriate article class and the like. Not much fun, not as efficient as I would like. But the biggest problems tend to be getting formatting just right during the text editing.I hope some day we improve the save-to-TeX end of this (possibly via style sheets that are journal-aware). $\endgroup$ – Daniel Lichtblau Jan 28 '17 at 16:54
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ It certainly is possible to create beautiful documents with Mathematica - we did our book in this manner, which also has the huge advantage of having live electronic versions of the same document/book that are interactive and identical to the printed version. BUT ... two column text is not something that Mma can practically do (at least the last time I tried, other than a manual grid box), and page layouts are a pain. $\endgroup$ – wolfies Jan 28 '17 at 16:54
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ @Daniel The TeX conversion is very much in need of updating. It should support the newly added common symbols, like the <| in associations. Instead of producing \unicode{...} when it doesn't know the correct LaTeX command, it should produce something which is easier to use directly, e.g. \symbol{"...} (like here). (I did suggest this to support before.) $\endgroup$ – Szabolcs Jan 29 '17 at 14:48
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ As an aside, apart from the above, Mathematica's typesetting quality is, of course, "make-your-skin-crawl" atrocious when compared to a true typesetting system such as LaTeX. So, "professional publication quality" is never going to happen in any case; not in the foreseeable future, anyway. $\endgroup$ – Pirx Jan 30 '17 at 0:21