For example (not what I really need but will fur sure answer my question)


At least this was my idea, but it does not work at all. You can see that the definition of der[x] includes the definition of another function. And I want to get its derivative.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Use Set rather than SetDelayed: der[x_] = D[f[x], x] or use Evaluate: der[x_] := Evaluate@D[f[x], x]. In either case, afterwards look at ?der $\endgroup$ – Bob Hanlon Dec 22 '16 at 16:42
  • $\begingroup$ Your function works as expected for me. If you want to evaluate functions of the form Sin[u] change der to der[u_, x_] := D[f[u], x], allowing you to call der[x^2, x] $\endgroup$ – Feyre Dec 22 '16 at 16:45

So this is an evaluation order problem, my quick fix would be to do the derivative using a different variable then substitute x back in at the end:

f[x_] := Sin[x];
der[x_] := D[f[y], y] /. y -> x;
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ One would do well to make y local via Module I think, or use a Formal Symbol. +1 however. $\endgroup$ – Mr.Wizard Dec 22 '16 at 17:22
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Mr.Wizard I believe a formal symbol would suffer the same pitfall as Slot[1] in my answer (e.g. Sin[\[FormalY] * x]). Since a formal symbol is more likely to be used as a parameter than Slot[], perhaps it is less safe. $\endgroup$ – Michael E2 Dec 22 '16 at 19:01
  • $\begingroup$ @Michael If I follow your logic the session-unique Module variable is OK however, correct? $\endgroup$ – Mr.Wizard Dec 22 '16 at 22:18
  • $\begingroup$ @Mr.Wizard Yes, it should be. It seems the system will bump the module number up if someone decides y$13214 is their favorite parameter name, and the next module number is 13214. So a conflict shouldn't arise, AFAICT. $\endgroup$ – Michael E2 Dec 23 '16 at 0:12
  • $\begingroup$ I can confirm that in my case wrapping the body in a Module was what I needed for the gradient of a bivariate function f, like gradfun[x_, y_] := Module[{a, b}, D[f[a, b], {{a, b}}] /. {a -> x, b -> y}];. Very helpful tip, thanks! $\endgroup$ – Laryx Decidua Sep 27 '19 at 11:12

Two more ways:

der[x_] := f'[x];

der[x_] := With[{df = D[f[#], #]}, df &[x]];

The second way follows the way the system implements f' (Derivative), so they're as safe as Mathematica. However, both solutions above suffer the same restriction that Derivative does:

This is okay:

ff[x_] := Sin[3 * x];
der[x_] := ff'[x];
(*  3 Cos[3 x]  *)

But not this:

ff[x_] := Sin[# * x];
der[x_] := ff'[x];
(*  2 x Cos[x^2]  *)

What happened to the coefficient #??? (For a hint, use Trace.)

You can check directly that ff'[x] misbehaves:

D[ff[x], x]
  2 x Cos[x^2]
  Cos[x #1] #1

Moral: Slot[] is not safe as a parameter when differentiating.

  • $\begingroup$ See also this Q&A: (99439) $\endgroup$ – Michael E2 Dec 23 '16 at 0:20

Try this

f = Sin[#] &
der = D[#, x] &

or this

der[f_[x]] = d[f[x], x]
l[x_] = a x + b x^2

Normally your definition should works --- it works on my computer. Restart the kernel.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.