Question: I have three functions that I am declaring.

Rx[\[Alpha]_] := Exp[-I \[Alpha] Gx];
Ry[\[Alpha]_] := Exp[-I \[Alpha] Gy];
Rz[\[Alpha]_] := Exp[-I \[Alpha] Gz];

I want to Series expand and simplify the product:
Rx[-v] Ry[-v] Rx[v] Ry[v]

i.e. Series[Rx[-v] Ry[-v] Rx[v] Ry[v], {v, 0, 2}]

The catch is, Gx, Gy and Gz don't commute with one another...

Is there a way to Series expand this product, and then simplify it, given that these three variables alone don't commute? (They commute with everything else...)

  • $\begingroup$ You would need to define a custom operator which doesn't allow commutativity between the elements, Mathematica's standard Times (reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/Times.html) is not suitable for this use case. $\endgroup$
    – ktm
    Nov 1, 2016 at 15:46
  • $\begingroup$ How might I specify, not that the functions do not commute, but specifically the variables gx gy and gz? $\endgroup$ Nov 1, 2016 at 15:48
  • $\begingroup$ @user6014, that's what NonCommutativeMultiply[] is intended for. $\endgroup$ Mar 29, 2017 at 13:59

1 Answer 1


One approach would be to define a new multiplication operator (e.g. using CenterDot or any other predefined binary operator without a set definition), and define multiplication rules differentiating between expressions that do and do not contain Gx, Gy, Gz.

For example:

CenterDot[a___, b_?(FreeQ[#, Gx | Gy | Gz] &), c___] :=  b CenterDot[a, c]
CenterDot[a___, b_?(FreeQ[#, Gx | Gy | Gz] &) d_, c___] :=  b CenterDot[a, d, c]
CenterDot[a___, b_ + d_, c___] :=  CenterDot[a, b, c] + CenterDot[a, d, c]
CenterDot[] := 1
CenterDot[a_] := a

 CenterDot[Exp[I v Gx],Exp[I v Gy],Exp[-I x Gx],Exp[-I v Gy]] /. 
  Exp[A_] :> Normal@Series[Exp[A], {v, 0, 2}]
{v, 0, 2}

Would produce the result for your example.

Update: Adding the following rule will help in dealing with powers of the same element

CenterDot[a___, (b : (Gx | Gy | Gz))^n_., (b : (Gx | Gy | Gz))^m_.,   c___] :=
    CenterDot[a, b^(n + m), c]
  • $\begingroup$ My example should simplify to 1 - (GxGy - GyGx)v^2, but it doesn't. It's close though. Know the problem? $\endgroup$ Nov 1, 2016 at 16:34
  • $\begingroup$ @jackskis There was a silly typo. The last rule should have read CenterDot[a_] := a (now it does.) $\endgroup$
    – TimRias
    Nov 4, 2016 at 9:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.