RSolve yields a large (multi-page) solution (LeafCount=25891) containing a number of 7F6 (and higher) hypergeometric functions when applied to

DifferenceRoot[Function[{\[FormalY], \[FormalN]}, {62022240 + 545995032*\[FormalN] + 2056791388*\[FormalN]^2 + 
   4333244560*\[FormalN]^3 + 5587600700*\[FormalN]^4 + 4517982000*\[FormalN]^5 + 2238010000*\[FormalN]^6 + 
   621200000*\[FormalN]^7 + 74000000*\[FormalN]^8 + (-19027008 - 158454120*\[FormalN] - 566231672*\[FormalN]^2 - 
     1135130960*\[FormalN]^3 - 1397526400*\[FormalN]^4 - 1082880000*\[FormalN]^5 - 516080000*\[FormalN]^6 - 
     138400000*\[FormalN]^7 - 16000000*\[FormalN]^8)*\[FormalY][\[FormalN]] + 3*(2 + 5*\[FormalN])*(3 + 5*\[FormalN])^2*
    (4 + 5*\[FormalN])*(6 + 5*\[FormalN])*(5 + 6*\[FormalN])*(7 + 6*\[FormalN])*(31 + 20*\[FormalN])*\[FormalY][1 + \[FormalN]] == 0, 
 \[FormalY][1] == 158/31}]][n]

But I think that RSolve is working here without respect to the apparent highly-structured form of the input (just essentially expanding everything out before further proceeding). But various subject-matter considerations lead me to conjecture that there is a much more compact/elegant solution. (Of course, one can try to simplify the actual very large solution--but previous experience indicates that is a most formidable--if even doable--task.)

So, my question here is how--if at all possible--one might incorporate the special structure of the DifferenceRoot expression in the RSolve (or some equivalent) process?

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks J_Nat. Yes, that is precisely what I did--with the very large output (LeafCount=25891) being produced after (roughly) a few hours. $\endgroup$ – Paul B. Slater Aug 19 '16 at 19:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ After about an hour FunctionExpand yields a result with a LeafCount of "only" 19429. It contains instances of HypergeometricPFQ with 54 different arguments. $\endgroup$ – bbgodfrey Aug 19 '16 at 19:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ And, after an additional quarter-hour, Simplify[%, n \[Element] Integers && n > 0] reduces LeafCount` to 13886. $\endgroup$ – bbgodfrey Aug 19 '16 at 20:11
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks very much, bbgodfrey! I guess I could replicate your results, but maybe you could send them to me (slater@kitp.ucsb.edu). (I wasn't aware of the particular use of Simplify[]--interesting!) $\endgroup$ – Paul B. Slater Aug 19 '16 at 20:55
  • $\begingroup$ Wow, I'm impressed and thankful for all your hard efforts, bbgodfey. I've been "messing around" for some time with big hypergeometric expressions strongly related, it would seem off-hand, to this one (see Fig. 3 in arxiv.org/pdf/1301.6617.pdf). Off-hand I'm not optimistic about the use of FullSimplify--but let's hope for something miraculous. $\endgroup$ – Paul B. Slater Aug 19 '16 at 21:59

As previously indicated, RSolve provides a large ("hypergeometric-function-abundant") solution (LeafCount=25981). Mathematica indicates that the solution naturally breaks into two parts--the first having a LeafCount of 5250. High-precision numerics, followed by rationalizations and use of the FindSequenceFunction command gives for this first part the relatively simple (hypergeometric-free) formula

(5*3^(-1 - 3*\[FormalN])*8^(1 + 2*\[FormalN])*(3 + 5*\[FormalN])*Pochhammer[7/10, \[FormalN]]*Pochhammer[9/10, \[FormalN]]*
Pochhammer[1, \[FormalN]]*Pochhammer[11/10, \[FormalN]]*Pochhammer[13/10, \[FormalN]]*
Pochhammer[3/2, \[FormalN]])/((11 + 20*\[FormalN])*Pochhammer[2/5, \[FormalN]]*Pochhammer[3/5, \[FormalN]]*
Pochhammer[4/5, \[FormalN]]*Pochhammer[5/6, \[FormalN]]*Pochhammer[7/6, \[FormalN]]*Pochhammer[6/5, \[FormalN]])

Now if we subtract its values from the original DifferenceRoot[Function, giving us the values of the second part, we, quite amazingly it would seem, get back exactly the original function but for the single change that y[1] now equals -4102/93, rather than 158/31 = 474/93. It would seem that this must be indicating something of a profound nature about the original function (and hopefully a relatively simple formula for it), but at present I don't see what that is.

| improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ RSolve has now given me the solution with y[1]=-4102/93, instead of the original 158/31 = 474/93. Again, the solution naturally breaks into two parts, with exactly the same LeafCounts. But now, the first part (which had the relatively simple hypergeometric-free formula for it previously with the use of 158/31) turns out to be identically zero (as high-precision numerics convincingly indicate). So, the other part would simply yield the values used to produce the second DifferentialRoot[Function to which RSolve was just applied. $\endgroup$ – Paul B. Slater Aug 21 '16 at 16:33
  • $\begingroup$ On the mathematics stack exchange site, I inquired as to how Maple might handle the equation--and was given a solution, presently "hypergeometric-free", but with a (yet unperformed) summation that conceivably might lead to hypergeometric functions. Here is the link math.stackexchange.com/questions/1903720/… $\endgroup$ – Paul B. Slater Aug 26 '16 at 16:29
  • $\begingroup$ I did translate the Maple output of Love to Mathematica and performed the (implicit) summation. The result has a very similar nature to the one originally obtained in Mathematica, with the same set of hypergeometric terms, all with argument 27/64, appearing. So, it would seem that the two languages take similar approaches (as to which I was curious) to the recurrence equations. $\endgroup$ – Paul B. Slater Aug 26 '16 at 19:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.