This question of mine got a bit ruined by the fact that I got a bit confused. I hope this separate question will take away this confusion. My confusion was that I found it strange that we have, for
x = 3;
g[_Symbol] := "yay"
that as expected
g[Unevaluated[x]]
"yay"
but
g[_Symbol] := "yay"
g[Sequence[Unevaluated[x]]]
g[Unevaluated[x]]
and even
With[
{yyyy = g[Sequence[Unevaluated[x]]]}
, Identity[yyyy]
]
g[Unevaluated[x]]
The strange thing here is that even though g[Unevaluated[x]]
is not in its "final form" (at a fixed point), in the sense that a rule can be applied to this as we can see above, Mathematica stops evaluating. I show the third example in which With
occurs, because one might have thought that the behavior occurs because Mathematica assumes that rules for g
have already been applied or something. But even when we use With
(or in fact, Identity
, With
is really not necessary) to start a "clean evaluation", Mathematica refuses to do the last step.
For a little while, I had the following question/hypothesis about this: "Does Mathematica remember if an expression has been fully evaluated?". Using that I found another similar example. We have
Clear[h, somethingElse, something]
h[something, something = somethingElse]
h[something, somethingElse]
even though, if we evaluate the resulting expression again, we have
h[something, somethingElse]
h[somethingElse,somethingElse]
But this time, we have
Clear[h, somethingElse, something]
Identity[h[something, something = somethingElse]]
h[somethingElse, somethingElse]
So that Mathematica does continue evaluation in this case. The same happens for a user-defined Identity
. Note that the following does not result in a "fixed point" (expression that is left unchanged by the rules).
Clear[h, somethingElse, something]
List[h[something, something = somethingElse]]
{h[something, somethingElse]}
Which probably makes sense. I guess Identity is defined in terms of a rule, and after a rule we have to evaluate again. However, if we put something in a list, we can assume that the thing inside the list was evaluated correctly so we don't have to evaluate again.
Little tentative conclusion: It is not true that Mathematica repeatedly evaluates an expression until it does not change anymore. It seems to be a little more subtle than that.
The question is: Is it a bug that
g[_Symbol] := "yay"
Identity[g[Sequence[Unevaluated[x]]]]
Evaluates to
g[Unevaluated[x]]
?
g[Unevaluated[x]]
is a strange end result as we can copy paste it into a new input cell and it will evaluate to "yay". Do you agree that that is unusual? (this is not what I feel is a bug... but its close :) ) $\endgroup$