2
$\begingroup$

I have a parametric plot y(t) vs. x(t). I want to know exactly at what value of x, this y vs x curve crosses the x-axis? I tried with "Get coordinates" of Drawing tools but this is not so accurate. Can anyone please tell me how I can print the exact point of intersection between this curve and x-axis?

I want to find at what value of t, dbdt becomes zero.

$\endgroup$
18
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ How about Solve[y[t]==0,t] $\endgroup$
    – mikado
    Sep 5, 2016 at 20:33
  • $\begingroup$ I had tried with Solve too. But it was taking so much time (more than half an hour and still running) to print output! Actually these functions are not so simple. They both are like implicit functions f(x(y(z...)))). I don't care about the value of the independent variable t at which y becomes zero. I need the value of x only. If there is a faster way, please let me know. $\endgroup$
    – cosmos
    Sep 5, 2016 at 20:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Can you give what you actually have in code? $\endgroup$
    – Feyre
    Sep 5, 2016 at 21:00
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Please edit your question with the code, and provide a functioning code, this code won't run. $\endgroup$
    – Feyre
    Sep 5, 2016 at 21:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ FindRoot[] is the way to find roots numerically, especially of equations that are difficult (e.g. non-analytic, use a numerical procedure such as NIntegrate, etc.). You should post code that adequately reproduces the computational issue you're having, but it doesn't have to be your private/confidential code. $\endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    Sep 5, 2016 at 21:46

2 Answers 2

4
$\begingroup$

You may use MeshFunctions, though I don't know the precision :

gr00 = ParametricPlot[{t, t^2 - 1}, {t, 0, 2}, Mesh -> {{0}}, 
  MeshFunctions ->  {#2 &}, 
  MeshStyle -> Directive[Black, PointSize[.05]]]

enter image description here

Cases[Normal[gr00], Point[___], {1, Infinity}]  

{Point[{0.999811, 0.}]}

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I got blank {{}} as output! $\endgroup$
    – cosmos
    Sep 5, 2016 at 22:12
  • $\begingroup$ This probably won't work if the curve is tangent to the axis. Not sure what to recommend for that case. $\endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    Sep 7, 2016 at 12:52
2
$\begingroup$

Consider

x[u_] := Sin[u]
y[u_] := Sin[2 u]
ParametricPlot[{x[u], y[u]}, {u, 0, 2 Pi}]

enter image description here

Solve for u an equation $y(u)=0$:

sol = u /. Solve[y[u] == 0, u]

{ConditionalExpression[[Pi] C1, C1 [Element] Integers], ConditionalExpression[1/2 ([Pi] + 2 [Pi] C1), C1 [Element] Integers]}

Evaluate x[u] taking sol as input and taking into account the conditions from the ConditionalExpressions:

Table[Simplify[x[sol[[i]]], Assumptions -> sol[[i, 2]]], {i, 1, Length@sol}]

{0, (-1)^C1}

One probably has to check what values can C[1] take (in this case Integers), so maybe instead

Simplify[x[sol], Assumptions -> sol]

{ConditionalExpression[Sin[[Pi] C1], C1 [Element] Integers], ConditionalExpression[Cos[[Pi] C1], C1 [Element] Integers]}

which on the other hand returns a slightly less clear solution.


EDIT: I developed a different method, suitable for this problem also, while answering another question.

Let's take the plot in the form

x[u_] := Sin[u]
y[u_] := Sin[2 u]
curve = Show[
  ParametricPlot[{x[u], y[u]}, {u, 0, 2 Pi}, Axes -> None, 
   PlotRangePadding -> None], 
  Plot[0, {x, -1, 1}, Axes -> None, PlotRangePadding -> None]]

and extract the pixel positions of intersection with

px = PixelValuePositions[#, White] & @
  MorphologicalBranchPoints @ Thinning @ Binarize @ ColorNegate @ curve

{{180, 182}, {2, 180}, {180, 180}, {359, 180}, {180, 179}}

We need to connect them to the actual coordinates on the plot:

pl = PlotRange@curve

{{-1., 1.}, {-1., 0.999999}}

id = ImageDimensions@curve

{360, 360}

The relation between pl and id is linear, $y=ax+b$ and $y=cx+d$ in the horizontal and vertical directions, respecively:

{a, b} = {a, b} /. 
  First@Solve[{pl[[1, 1]] == b, pl[[1, 2]] == a id[[1]] + b}, {a, b}]
{c, d} = {c, d} /. 
  First@Solve[{pl[[2, 1]] == d, pl[[2, 2]] == c id[[2]] + d}, {c, d}]

{0.00555555, -1.}

{0.00555555, -1.}

The pixel positions transformed to plot coordinates:

ic = {a #1 + b, c #2 + d} & @@@ px

{{9.49664*10^-9, 0.011111}, {-0.988889, -1.50139*10^-7}, {9.49664*10^-9, \ -1.50139*10^-7}, {0.994444, -1.50139*10^-7}, {9.49664*10^-9, \ -0.0055557}}

look like this:

enter image description here

We can get rid of the ambiguity (5 points for 3 intersections) with clustering:

clu = ClusterClassify[ic, Method -> "DBSCAN"]

Number of clusters: 3

g = GatherBy[ic, clu]
icmean = Chop[#, 10^-6] &@Reverse[Mean /@ g]

{{0.994444, 0}, {-0.988889, 0}, {0, 0.0018517}}

Show[curve, Graphics[{PointSize[Large], Point[#]}] &@icmean]

enter image description here

which looks very good; icmean are the positions of the three intersections.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.