Timeline for Finding a subsequence in a list
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2015 at 1:42 | answer | added | Murta | timeline score: 22 | |
| Mar 25, 2014 at 21:41 | comment | added | Kuba |
You can still Riffle your list with any marker and use it in string you are going to look for too. Now it works for different legths.
|
|
| Feb 1, 2012 at 11:05 | history | edited | J. M.'s missing motivation♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Jan 29, 2012 at 15:12 | comment | added | Leonid Shifrin |
For packed arrays, the fastest method I am aware of is the seqposC function from this answer: stackoverflow.com/questions/8364804/…
|
|
| Jan 29, 2012 at 14:57 | vote | accept | Rojo | ||
| Jan 29, 2012 at 14:57 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackMma/status/163636817499922432 | ||
| Jan 29, 2012 at 14:51 | comment | added | Rojo | @Szabolcs, ok, for whatever reason I'll post my recent idea too, hehe, tell me what you think | |
| Jan 29, 2012 at 14:43 | comment | added | Szabolcs | @Rojo Leave it, people shouldn't be expected to check SO before posting. I posted my favourite solution as an answer, and credited the original answerer. | |
| Jan 29, 2012 at 14:42 | answer | added | Szabolcs | timeline score: 24 | |
| Jan 29, 2012 at 14:42 | comment | added | Rojo | @Szabolcs, thanks. I'll read it now. What should I do? Close this question? Or leave it because it hasn't been asked heeere? | |
| Jan 29, 2012 at 14:40 | comment | added | Szabolcs | I asked something very similar here: stackoverflow.com/questions/8740033/… | |
| Jan 29, 2012 at 14:30 | history | asked | Rojo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |