Timeline for Is FindRoot wrong about its WorkingPrecision?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2018 at 2:40 | vote | accept | Max | ||
| Feb 22, 2018 at 5:51 | answer | added | ilian | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 22, 2018 at 5:17 | history | edited | Max | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 259 characters in body
|
| Jan 27, 2018 at 3:56 | answer | added | Michael E2 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 6, 2016 at 23:48 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackMma/status/684884320037781504 | ||
| Jul 23, 2015 at 23:21 | comment | added | Max | I'm inclined to agree, but this (a) seems problematic and (b) doesn't explain why the answer would claim to have precision equal to WorkingPrecision. | |
| Jul 23, 2015 at 21:24 | comment | added | george2079 |
My assumption would be FindRoot makes its assessment based on the expression you supply before it begins evaluation. It doesn't know the precision of y[x] until after it supplies a numeric argument.
|
|
| Jul 22, 2015 at 21:59 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 22, 2015 at 22:05 | |||||
| Jul 22, 2015 at 21:59 | history | asked | Max | CC BY-SA 3.0 |