Timeline for Fitting and plotting Weibull distribution
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2015 at 23:22 | history | edited | Andy Ross | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 104 characters in body
|
| Jul 14, 2015 at 23:21 | comment | added | Andy Ross |
@SjoerdC.deVries I've unintentionally made things too complicated by trying to point out that the zeros get ignored. I was hoping to not get into any more detail than that :) Removing all reference to NonlinearModelFit
|
|
| Jul 14, 2015 at 23:16 | comment | added | Sjoerd C. de Vries | @Andy I believe what Karsten means here is that in my FindFit all numbers are treated equally, although there is more data in the higher frequencies. I guess that's true, but I suppose that the difference in modelling assumptions/methods between NonLinearModelFit and EstimatedDistribution plays a role too. | |
| Jul 14, 2015 at 22:19 | history | edited | Andy Ross | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body; added 2 characters in body; added 19 characters in body
|
| Jul 14, 2015 at 22:10 | history | edited | Andy Ross | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Jul 14, 2015 at 13:58 | history | edited | Andy Ross | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 197 characters in body
|
| Jul 14, 2015 at 13:44 | history | answered | Andy Ross | CC BY-SA 3.0 |