Timeline for What am I missing on this part of the documentation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2015 at 19:04 | vote | accept | Giovanni F. | ||
| Jun 12, 2015 at 18:21 | answer | added | m_goldberg | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 12, 2015 at 17:26 | comment | added | Michael E2 | Yes, it's strange. I wonder if it has changed since some version. | |
| Jun 12, 2015 at 17:23 | comment | added | Giovanni F. | This documentation example just adds nothing then. | |
| Jun 12, 2015 at 17:20 | comment | added | Michael E2 | So the assumptions are irrelevant, since the simplification is valid more generally. | |
| Jun 12, 2015 at 17:17 | comment | added | Giovanni F. | I get the same result. | |
| Jun 12, 2015 at 17:14 | comment | added | Michael E2 |
Try FullSimplify[E^(LogGamma[x] + LogGamma[y])] without assumptions.
|
|
| Jun 12, 2015 at 17:11 | history | edited | Giovanni F. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 83 characters in body
|
| Jun 12, 2015 at 17:04 | history | asked | Giovanni F. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |