Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 11, 2015 at 8:51 vote accept mcocdawc
Jun 11, 2015 at 8:51 vote accept mcocdawc
Jun 11, 2015 at 8:51
Jun 10, 2015 at 21:40 answer added JimB timeline score: 4
Jun 10, 2015 at 19:46 comment added mcocdawc I got the same problem whit the 6.39247197093749 when i copied from the website. It works if it is read from a CSV file.
Jun 10, 2015 at 19:43 history edited mcocdawc CC BY-SA 3.0
added 242 characters in body
Jun 10, 2015 at 19:26 comment added MarcoB Unfortunately I can't help you in pinpointing the origin of the drop in precision, but it seems that you can get what you want by manually setting your input values to an arbitrary (high) precision: tableofvalues = SetPrecision[#, 40]& @ {yourdata}. You will then obtain coefficients from your expression that are numerically the same to within the precision you have set. Further note: I also get the 6.39... answers from your code that @belisarius reported.
Jun 10, 2015 at 19:15 comment added Dr. belisarius Using your data, the results from your NumberForm[ ] in my machine are more like 6.39247197093749 ....
Jun 10, 2015 at 19:09 comment added mcocdawc Beside from this I would like to understand where this decrease of precision of 8 orders of magnitude comes from.
Jun 10, 2015 at 19:08 comment added mcocdawc I made this table as minimal example. But I also need coupling constants lateron. For example the linear factor a*x[1]*x[4]. So it's not possible to just skipt x[3] and x[4] and mirror x[1] and x[2] onto them. For the diagonal elements this was of course possible.
Jun 10, 2015 at 18:36 comment added Dr. belisarius Just curious: Adding degrees of freedom artificially will make your results worse. If you already know that the model's coefficients have a certain relationship, why don't you state that right in the model?
Jun 10, 2015 at 18:16 history asked mcocdawc CC BY-SA 3.0