Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:55 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://mathematica.stackexchange.com/ with https://mathematica.stackexchange.com/
Jun 10, 2015 at 10:56 vote accept kjo
Jun 9, 2015 at 17:16 comment added JimB Very good update. And by "numerically" (rather than "visually") I was referring to things like "the smallest area under the surface that encompasses 95% of the probability" which are used in animal home ranges as opposed to the height of the probability surface. So rather than contours at fixed and uniformly spaced heights/elevations, a set of contours with associated coverage probabilities is sometimes more desirable. (And as been pointed out by others, desirable things also depend on the objectives rather than just the data.)
Jun 9, 2015 at 17:09 history edited MarcoB CC BY-SA 3.0
Added legend to DensityHistogram chart
Jun 9, 2015 at 16:54 comment added MarcoB @JimBaldwin I think you make an excellent point regarding the comparisons. I believe that this can be addressed from within the *DensityHistogram functions themselves (please take a look at the updated version of my answer). What do you think?
Jun 9, 2015 at 16:52 history edited MarcoB CC BY-SA 3.0
Added a solution based on DensityHistogram; refs to existing questions; addressed Jim's comment
Jun 9, 2015 at 15:34 comment added JimB This will give a good visual feel for the density but if a more quantitative approach is desired, then I'd repeat my above comment that SmoothKernelDistribution would allow for drawing contours that enclosed a specified proportion of points or a specified volume (probability). This becomes more important if two or more datasets are being compared and need comparable coloring/contour schemes. (But maybe there's an option for a SmoothDensityHistogram that allows one to specify contour heights.)
Jun 9, 2015 at 15:18 history answered MarcoB CC BY-SA 3.0