Timeline for How can we make publication-quality PlotMarkers without version 10?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2017 at 6:32 | history | edited | Alexey Popkov |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:55 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathematica.stackexchange.com/ with https://mathematica.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jul 21, 2015 at 18:37 | comment | added | Oleksandr R. | @Szabolcs I am not sure, to be honest. As you might have guessed, I am not using version 10 very much yet, partly due to its incredibly tedious "Formatting notebook contents" messages with non-default color profiles, and partly because I am still on Windows 2003 at home. So I wrote this question with the knowledge that something had been improved in version 10, but not really exactly what or how much. If you think the question can be improved, please feel free to edit it. | |
| Jul 21, 2015 at 14:56 | comment | added | Szabolcs |
The question is about how to get nice results in v9 or earlier. But what problems does v10 really fix? Plot markers are still font glyphs, they are still not properly centred, they are still not properly sized with the Automatic setting (the squares look much smaller than the disks). So what does v10 fix? Edit: Ah, I see, we have to change the PlotTheme, right? But it only seems to have open markers.
|
|
| Jun 3, 2015 at 21:20 | vote | accept | Oleksandr R. | ||
| Jun 3, 2015 at 18:13 | answer | added | Alexey Popkov | timeline score: 94 | |
| May 31, 2015 at 21:40 | answer | added | Jens | timeline score: 28 | |
| May 31, 2015 at 20:33 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackMma/status/605109921298960384 | ||
| S May 31, 2015 at 17:15 | answer | added | Oleksandr R. | timeline score: 46 | |
| S May 31, 2015 at 17:15 | history | asked | Oleksandr R. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |