Skip to main content
added 161 characters in body
Source Link

Please let me know if I'm missing something but, contrary to what's been said above, it doesn't appear that the following two expressions are equal:

e1 = -Log[Cos[t/2] - Sin[t/2]] + Log[Cos[t/2] + Sin[t/2]]

e2 = Log[Sec[t] + Tan[t]]

e1 /. t -> Pi

gives: -i Pi

e2 /. t -> Pi

gives: i Pi

e1 /. t -> Pi/2.

gives: 37.0834

e2 /. t -> Pi/2.

gives: 38.025

EDIT: I think I partly figured it out -- when t=Pi, the arguments of the logs (after using the identity log(x) - log(y) = log(x/y) are, in both cases, -1, so we get -i Pi in one case, and i Pi in the other (because of the negative sign):

(Cos[t/2] + Sin[t/2])/(Cos[t/2] - Sin[t/2]) /. t -> Pi

gives -1

Sec[t] + Tan[t] /. t -> Pi

gives -1

And when When t=Pi/2, the arguments of the logs are some very large numbers, so we may be getting round-off errors.

Please let me know if I'm missing something but, contrary to what's been said above, it doesn't appear that the following two expressions are equal:

e1 = -Log[Cos[t/2] - Sin[t/2]] + Log[Cos[t/2] + Sin[t/2]]

e2 = Log[Sec[t] + Tan[t]]

e1 /. t -> Pi

gives: -i Pi

e2 /. t -> Pi

gives: i Pi

e1 /. t -> Pi/2.

gives: 37.0834

e2 /. t -> Pi/2.

gives: 38.025

EDIT: I think I partly figured it out -- when t=Pi, the arguments of the logs (after using the identity log(x) - log(y) = log(x/y) are, in both cases, -1, so we get -i Pi in one case, and i Pi in the other (because of the negative sign):

(Cos[t/2] + Sin[t/2])/(Cos[t/2] - Sin[t/2]) /. t -> Pi

gives -1

Sec[t] + Tan[t] /. t -> Pi

gives -1

And when t=Pi/2, the arguments of the logs are some very large numbers, so we may be getting round-off errors.

Please let me know if I'm missing something but, contrary to what's been said above, it doesn't appear that the following two expressions are equal:

e1 = -Log[Cos[t/2] - Sin[t/2]] + Log[Cos[t/2] + Sin[t/2]]

e2 = Log[Sec[t] + Tan[t]]

e1 /. t -> Pi

gives: -i Pi

e2 /. t -> Pi

gives: i Pi

e1 /. t -> Pi/2.

gives: 37.0834

e2 /. t -> Pi/2.

gives: 38.025

EDIT: When t=Pi/2, the arguments of the logs are some very large numbers, so we may be getting round-off errors.

added 161 characters in body
Source Link

Please let me know if I'm missing something but, contrary to what's been said above, it doesn't appear that the following two expressions are equal:

e1 = -Log[Cos[t/2] - Sin[t/2]] + Log[Cos[t/2] + Sin[t/2]]

e2 = Log[Sec[t] + Tan[t]]

e1 /. t -> Pi

gives: -i Pi

e2 /. t -> Pi

gives: i Pi

e1 /. t -> Pi/2.

gives: 37.0834

e2 /. t -> Pi/2.

gives: 38.025

EDIT: I think I partly figured it out -- when t=Pi, the arguments of the logs (after using the identity log(x) - log(y) = log(x/y) are, in both cases, -1, so we get -i Pi in one case, and i Pi in the other (because of the negative sign):

(Cos[t/2] + Sin[t/2])/(Cos[t/2] - Sin[t/2]) /.
And t -> Pi

gives -1

Sec[t] + Tan[t] /. t -> Pi

gives -1

And when t=Pi/2, the arguments of the logs are some very large numbers, so we may be getting round-off errors.

Please let me know if I'm missing something but, contrary to what's been said above, it doesn't appear that the following two expressions are equal:

e1 = -Log[Cos[t/2] - Sin[t/2]] + Log[Cos[t/2] + Sin[t/2]]

e2 = Log[Sec[t] + Tan[t]]

e1 /. t -> Pi

gives: -i Pi

e2 /. t -> Pi

gives: i Pi

e1 /. t -> Pi/2.

gives: 37.0834

e2 /. t -> Pi/2.

gives: 38.025

EDIT: I think I partly figured it out -- when t=Pi, the arguments of the logs are, in both cases, -1, so we get -i Pi in one case, and i Pi in the other (because of the negative sign).
And when t=Pi/2, the arguments of the logs are some very large numbers, so we may be getting round-off errors.

Please let me know if I'm missing something but, contrary to what's been said above, it doesn't appear that the following two expressions are equal:

e1 = -Log[Cos[t/2] - Sin[t/2]] + Log[Cos[t/2] + Sin[t/2]]

e2 = Log[Sec[t] + Tan[t]]

e1 /. t -> Pi

gives: -i Pi

e2 /. t -> Pi

gives: i Pi

e1 /. t -> Pi/2.

gives: 37.0834

e2 /. t -> Pi/2.

gives: 38.025

EDIT: I think I partly figured it out -- when t=Pi, the arguments of the logs (after using the identity log(x) - log(y) = log(x/y) are, in both cases, -1, so we get -i Pi in one case, and i Pi in the other (because of the negative sign):

(Cos[t/2] + Sin[t/2])/(Cos[t/2] - Sin[t/2]) /. t -> Pi

gives -1

Sec[t] + Tan[t] /. t -> Pi

gives -1

And when t=Pi/2, the arguments of the logs are some very large numbers, so we may be getting round-off errors.

added 402 characters in body
Source Link

Please let me know if I'm missing something but, contrary to what's been said above, it doesn't appear that the following two expressions are equal:

e1 = -Log[Cos[t/2] - Sin[t/2]] + Log[Cos[t/2] + Sin[t/2]]

e2 = Log[Sec[t] + Tan[t]]

e1 /. t -> Pi

gives: -i Pi

e2 /. t -> Pi

gives: i Pi

e1 /. t -> Pi/2.

gives: 37.0834

e2 /. t -> Pi/2.

gives: 38.025

EDIT: I think I partly figured it out -- when t=Pi, the arguments of the logs are, in both cases, -1, so we get -i Pi in one case, and i Pi in the other (because of the negative sign).
And when t=Pi/2, the arguments of the logs are some very large numbers, so we may be getting round-off errors.

Please let me know if I'm missing something but, contrary to what's been said above, it doesn't appear that the following two expressions are equal:

e1 = -Log[Cos[t/2] - Sin[t/2]] + Log[Cos[t/2] + Sin[t/2]]

e2 = Log[Sec[t] + Tan[t]]

e1 /. t -> Pi

gives: -i Pi

e2 /. t -> Pi

gives: i Pi

e1 /. t -> Pi/2.

gives: 37.0834

e2 /. t -> Pi/2.

gives: 38.025

Please let me know if I'm missing something but, contrary to what's been said above, it doesn't appear that the following two expressions are equal:

e1 = -Log[Cos[t/2] - Sin[t/2]] + Log[Cos[t/2] + Sin[t/2]]

e2 = Log[Sec[t] + Tan[t]]

e1 /. t -> Pi

gives: -i Pi

e2 /. t -> Pi

gives: i Pi

e1 /. t -> Pi/2.

gives: 37.0834

e2 /. t -> Pi/2.

gives: 38.025

EDIT: I think I partly figured it out -- when t=Pi, the arguments of the logs are, in both cases, -1, so we get -i Pi in one case, and i Pi in the other (because of the negative sign).
And when t=Pi/2, the arguments of the logs are some very large numbers, so we may be getting round-off errors.

edited body
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading