Timeline for Fick's Law over Implicit Regions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2021 at 17:43 | comment | added | chris |
I am not sure the solution is satisfactory though: if I try ContourPlot[ u[t, x, y] /. sol[[1]] /. t -> 1000, {x, y} \[Element] \[CapitalOmega]] I get a very rough function. Or did I miss something?
|
|
| Jan 24, 2015 at 14:16 | comment | added | Michael E2 | @bbgodfrey According to the 2nd comment to the question by user21, it seems to be an unintended restriction (bug) that the time variable precede the spatial variables. The error message made me think it might be a space v. time issue, but as I indicated, I sort of stumbled on a working solution by starting with a working example from the docs and adapting it. | |
| Jan 24, 2015 at 13:52 | comment | added | bbgodfrey |
@MichaelE2 In fact, based on the observation by @user21, the only substantive difference between your solution and that in the Question seems to be the order of variables in u[t, x, y]. But, why should that matter?
|
|
| Jan 24, 2015 at 13:46 | history | edited | Michael E2 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Improved code
|
| Jan 24, 2015 at 9:39 | comment | added | user21 | It should also work without the Method specification. | |
| Jan 24, 2015 at 3:58 | history | answered | Michael E2 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |