Timeline for Mysterious behaviour of Plot
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2014 at 4:35 | vote | accept | Quant | ||
| Dec 8, 2014 at 5:46 | answer | added | user9660 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 8, 2014 at 0:53 | comment | added | Quant | Is there a simple way to remove all the TraditionalForm wrapping? I don't honestly know how my equations got contaminated with that in the first place. | |
| Dec 7, 2014 at 19:37 | comment | added | Fred Simons | It does work, but now for every x first the complete list gsols is evaluated and of that only the first element element is used for the plotting. For efficiency, I would prefer Plot[gsols[[1]]//Evaluate, {x, -2, 2}] | |
| Dec 7, 2014 at 18:53 | comment | added | Szabolcs |
Sorry, I didn't read carefully. It appears that you have TraditionalForm wrapped around every single expression in that list. If you get rid of TraditionalForm, it should work. Appears to be the same situation as here: mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/3098/…
|
|
| Dec 7, 2014 at 18:07 | history | asked | Quant | CC BY-SA 3.0 |