Timeline for Escaping out of (or exiting) a Compiled Function
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2016 at 8:15 | vote | accept | QuantumDot | ||
| Nov 20, 2015 at 14:09 | vote | accept | QuantumDot | ||
| Nov 20, 2015 at 14:10 | |||||
| Nov 20, 2015 at 0:52 | history | edited | Karsten7 |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 20, 2015 at 0:24 | answer | added | Karsten7 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 19, 2015 at 22:30 | comment | added | Sjoerd C. de Vries | @QuantumDot OK, done | |
| Nov 19, 2015 at 22:29 | answer | added | Sjoerd C. de Vries | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 19, 2015 at 10:30 | comment | added | QuantumDot | @SjoerdC.deVries would you kindly turn your comment into an answer. I'll accept and this question will go off the unanswered list. | |
| Nov 29, 2014 at 17:54 | comment | added | QuantumDot | Ok, it looks like @SjoerdC.deVries 's method works and doesn't compromise the speed too much (at least in the cases I'm working on) | |
| Nov 29, 2014 at 14:37 | comment | added | Oleksandr R. | The uncompiled evaluation on returning an infinite or not-a-number value seems to be hard-wired in the VM. I don't think it's possible to avoid that except as described by Sjoerd. | |
| Nov 29, 2014 at 13:51 | comment | added | Sjoerd C. de Vries | You could use a wrapper function that calls the compiled function and that catches numeric error codes, for instance in this case negative numbers and acts on them. | |
| Nov 29, 2014 at 13:14 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackMma/status/538682321160138754 | ||
| Nov 29, 2014 at 11:28 | history | asked | QuantumDot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |