Timeline for Functional defined Ticks of LogLinearPlot does not work
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 30, 2014 at 18:30 | comment | added | Alexey Popkov |
@GeorgeWolfe It works because in your example the function is applied only to the linear axis. The bug appears when you apply it to the log-axis: LogPlot[x^2, {x, 0, 10}, Ticks -> {Automatic, myTicks}] .
|
|
Oct 30, 2014 at 18:19 | comment | added | George Wolfe | @AlexeyPopkov I found a tick function that does work with LogPlot. Why does this work? | |
Oct 30, 2014 at 18:17 | history | edited | George Wolfe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 154 characters in body
|
Oct 30, 2014 at 17:51 | comment | added | Alexey Popkov | @GeorgeWolfe It is a bug in the log-plotting code. See here the documented and expected behavior. | |
Oct 30, 2014 at 17:45 | comment | added | George Wolfe | So, why doesn't p2 have the proper ticks? | |
Oct 30, 2014 at 17:43 | comment | added | Alexey Popkov |
myTicks is just a Symbol and it is well-documented way to specify a ticks generating function. The generation of the Ticks specification is made Dynamic ally by a callback from the FrontEnd to the Kernel.
|
|
Oct 30, 2014 at 17:39 | history | edited | George Wolfe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 164 characters in body
|
Oct 30, 2014 at 17:33 | comment | added | George Wolfe | I don't think it's evaluated as a function without brackets and arguments. I tested it. But perhaps I made a mistake. | |
Oct 30, 2014 at 17:32 | comment | added | Junho Lee | myTicks is a function. p2 is exactly right syntax. | |
Oct 30, 2014 at 17:25 | history | answered | George Wolfe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |