Timeline for Why some built-in functions are slow
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 2, 2017 at 7:54 | history | edited | Kuba |
edited tags
|
|
Jun 11, 2015 at 15:35 | history | edited | Basheer Algohi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 41 characters in body
|
Mar 15, 2015 at 11:50 | history | edited | Mr.Wizard |
edited tags
|
|
Dec 19, 2014 at 7:54 | history | edited | Mr.Wizard |
edited tags
|
|
Dec 18, 2014 at 12:41 | history | edited | Basheer Algohi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Oct 25, 2014 at 15:20 | vote | accept | Basheer Algohi | ||
Oct 25, 2014 at 15:11 | vote | accept | Basheer Algohi | ||
Oct 25, 2014 at 15:12 | |||||
Oct 25, 2014 at 2:06 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackMma/status/525830693083828228 | ||
Oct 24, 2014 at 23:46 | answer | added | Jacob Akkerboom | timeline score: 32 | |
Oct 24, 2014 at 23:37 | comment | added | C. E.♦ | As for the more general question why built-ins are slower than what users can cobble together I think that is answered here and here. TL;DR There is no good reason. Developers just haven't gotten around to optimizing those functions yet. | |
Oct 24, 2014 at 23:17 | comment | added | Jacob Akkerboom |
DeleteDuplicates should be even faster! This question is strongly related. The answer is pretty much given in the chat that was created to discuss this.
|
|
Oct 24, 2014 at 23:11 | history | asked | Basheer Algohi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |