Timeline for Ηow to create an interpolated CDF from its samples?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2018 at 18:56 | history | edited | J. M.'s missing motivation♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 40 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Oct 11, 2012 at 1:31 | history | edited | J. M.'s missing motivation♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Oct 10, 2012 at 15:27 | answer | added | J. M.'s missing motivation♦ | timeline score: 14 | |
| May 24, 2012 at 2:26 | comment | added | László | @Emre: What would you suggest if the curve does not need to go through the points? | |
| May 23, 2012 at 19:08 | comment | added | Emre | Does it really need to go through the points or are they noisy estimates? | |
| May 23, 2012 at 8:52 | answer | added | Heike | timeline score: 10 | |
| May 23, 2012 at 8:12 | answer | added | kglr | timeline score: 8 | |
| May 23, 2012 at 1:11 | comment | added | azdahak | Here is something from Stan Wagon. | |
| May 23, 2012 at 0:52 | comment | added | azdahak | No, that is just normal cubic spline interpolation. The method in the wikipedia article will have to be implemented since I don't believe Interpolation[] has this option. | |
| May 23, 2012 at 0:49 | comment | added | László |
@azdahak: Sounds about right. But to be clear: Interpolation[..., InterpolationOrder -> 3, Method -> "Hermite"] is not doing this.
|
|
| May 23, 2012 at 0:39 | comment | added | azdahak | I think monotone cubic spline interpolation will do the trick. | |
| May 22, 2012 at 23:28 | history | edited | László | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed grammar
|
| May 22, 2012 at 22:43 | history | edited | László | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
commented about the list in the example
|
| May 22, 2012 at 22:41 | comment | added | László | Sure, I will make an edit about this, thanks. | |
| May 22, 2012 at 22:40 | comment | added | Vitaliy Kaurov | Your last point seems like an outlier. This are mutual neighbor divisions of horizontal coordinate: {ComplexInfinity, 2., 1.5, 1.33333, 1.25, 1.2, 1.33333, 1.25, 1.5, 1.33333, 2., 2.5, 2., 1.5, 1.33333, 2.5, 2., 1000.} They all seem comparable, besides the last point. | |
| May 22, 2012 at 22:23 | comment | added | László | FWIW: This is the US income distribution. There are some guesses what might be a nice analytical form, like a mixture of "something" and a Pareto tail, but I hoped I could avoid that. | |
| May 22, 2012 at 22:22 | comment | added | László | No, I did not want to go down that route. Then I know I could Fit the functional form on this list. | |
| May 22, 2012 at 22:17 | comment | added | Vitaliy Kaurov | Do you have an analytic model or guess for that function? | |
| May 22, 2012 at 22:06 | history | edited | rm -rf♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 47 characters in body; edited title
|
| May 22, 2012 at 21:58 | history | asked | László | CC BY-SA 3.0 |