Timeline for How to blend two photos in Mathematica?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2014 at 15:15 | comment | added | Sektor | @RahulNarain Because I wasn't trying to reply to your comment. I was just adding some info :D There's a big difference tho - I can fuse only the details, or the edges, or compress the image (lossy) or lossless, etc, etc | |
| Sep 3, 2014 at 14:23 | comment | added | user484 |
I don't understand how your reply addresses my comment. My point was that your method does exactly the same thing as ImageAdd[forest, tiger].
|
|
| Sep 3, 2014 at 11:50 | comment | added | Sektor | @RahulNarain Well, that's the classical algorithm - you can just google that and I am sure thousands of results will pop up. I have used the one I found in "Wavelet analysis and its applications, and active media technology" pt.1 (2004). Sadly, I have this book in my library, but not scanned.. If you want an explanation on how and why this algorithm works - you will have to wait (prepping for finals as we speak) | |
| Sep 3, 2014 at 0:39 | comment | added | user484 |
Wait, the wavelet transform is linear, so adding the wavelet coefficients is equivalent to just adding the pixel values. Indeed your result looks identical to @paw's answer using ImageAdd directly on the images.
|
|
| Sep 2, 2014 at 14:56 | history | answered | Sektor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |