Timeline for Dealing with square roots [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 24, 2015 at 2:56 | vote | accept | stinglikeabeer | ||
Aug 8, 2014 at 17:42 | history | closed |
Öskå Michael E2 m_goldberg Mr.Wizard |
Duplicate of Funny behaviour when plotting a polynomial of high degree and large coefficients | |
Aug 8, 2014 at 14:09 | answer | added | Bob Hanlon | timeline score: 1 | |
Aug 8, 2014 at 12:59 | comment | added | Michael E2 |
Similar: 3152, 7109, 18126, 38769. N.B. The solution WorkingPrecision -> Infinity from an answer to [7019] does not work on this example; but PPlot[N[f[x], 8], {x, 0, 10^4}, Exclusions -> None, WorkingPrecision -> Infinity] does. I'll propose [3152] as a duplicate.
|
|
Aug 8, 2014 at 11:16 | comment | added | rhermans | It does seem disappointing that the precision is not defined automatically based on the plot range and proportional value of a pixel. | |
Aug 8, 2014 at 10:21 | review | Close votes | |||
Aug 8, 2014 at 17:38 | |||||
Aug 8, 2014 at 10:04 | comment | added | Öskå |
Increase the WorkingPrecision : Plot[f[x], {x, 0, 10^4}, WorkingPrecision -> 20] gives this.
|
|
Aug 8, 2014 at 7:55 | history | edited | Teake Nutma | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added code and plot.
|
Aug 8, 2014 at 7:08 | comment | added | Mr.Wizard | Welcome to Mathematica.SE. Please include your expression as Mathematica code for easy handling by those who wish to answer. | |
Aug 8, 2014 at 7:02 | review | First posts | |||
Aug 8, 2014 at 7:08 | |||||
Aug 8, 2014 at 7:00 | history | asked | stinglikeabeer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |