Timeline for Can NDSolve handle discontinuous data?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2016 at 9:36 | history | edited | J. M.'s missing motivation♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 30, 2016 at 3:30 | history | edited | xzczd♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited tags
|
| Dec 19, 2014 at 20:35 | vote | accept | unlikely | ||
| Jul 29, 2014 at 19:17 | history | edited | unlikely | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 71 characters in body
|
| Jul 29, 2014 at 16:01 | answer | added | user21 | timeline score: 14 | |
| Jul 27, 2014 at 20:34 | comment | added | Michael E2 |
@Jens Could this be because DiscreteVariables were added in V9 -- that is, the error is the result of some advance in NDSolve that improves some area but is unreliable in another (hence the message)? (I do not know.) One can still achieve the V8 behavior via f[x_?NumericQ] := UnitBox[...] as Szabolcs has observed.
|
|
| Jul 27, 2014 at 18:36 | comment | added | Jens | I think this is a regression: your code produces the expected answer with no problem in Mathematica version 8. | |
| Jul 27, 2014 at 15:47 | answer | added | Michael E2 | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jul 27, 2014 at 15:46 | comment | added | Szabolcs | This is relevant: reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/DiscreteVariables.html | |
| Jul 27, 2014 at 15:41 | answer | added | Szabolcs | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jul 27, 2014 at 15:22 | history | asked | unlikely | CC BY-SA 3.0 |