Timeline for Why is there a huge performance gap using Map with more than 100 List entries
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 30, 2014 at 13:13 | vote | accept | Chris | ||
Jul 16, 2014 at 20:55 | comment | added | acl | @george2079 I've added an example in my answer, take a look | |
Jul 16, 2014 at 15:13 | comment | added | george2079 |
Can you show what d is? and isn't this the same : Map[d[[Sequence @@ #]] &, cube] ? I cant reproduce this slowness even on much larger lists.
|
|
Jul 16, 2014 at 11:57 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackMma/status/489378226461233152 | ||
Jul 16, 2014 at 11:04 | comment | added | acl |
@TeakeNutma I bet ... here really means {2,9,12},{tweedledee,tweedledum, "tweedleDUN"} . This reminds me of a book by a mathematician I once read which pointed out a remarkable device that physicists have come up with, namely, $\ldots$, which allows them to solve practically any problem simply by omission.
|
|
Jul 16, 2014 at 10:56 | comment | added | Teake Nutma |
Btw your cube is equal to Tuples[Range[5],3] , just so you know :).
|
|
Jul 16, 2014 at 10:48 | review | First posts | |||
Jul 16, 2014 at 10:55 | |||||
Jul 16, 2014 at 10:44 | answer | added | acl | timeline score: 9 | |
Jul 16, 2014 at 10:34 | history | asked | Chris | CC BY-SA 3.0 |