Timeline for Syntax for prefix mode with multiple arguments using @ shorthand
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
2 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2012 at 12:15 | comment | added | celtschk |
Well, Wolfram could have made the syntax f@a,b or f@(a,b) legal and equivalent to f[a,b]. But the former would have been problematic in argument lists (is f[a,g@b,c] the same as f[a,g[b],c] or as f[a,g[b,c]]?). The latter could have been done by just defining (a,b,c) to be equivalent to Sequence[a,b,c], however it provides little, if any, benefit to what is currently available.
|
|
| May 11, 2012 at 7:07 | history | answered | Ajasja | CC BY-SA 3.0 |