Skip to main content
23 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 13, 2018 at 3:51 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Jan 14, 2018 at 3:20 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Dec 15, 2017 at 2:47 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Nov 15, 2017 at 1:49 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Oct 16, 2017 at 1:11 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Sep 16, 2017 at 0:35 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Aug 16, 2017 at 23:59 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Jul 17, 2017 at 23:48 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Jun 17, 2017 at 23:20 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
May 18, 2017 at 21:17 answer added pdmclean timeline score: 2
Apr 16, 2014 at 17:26 comment added Dr. belisarius Yup. That's a cheap way to get 10^3 sequential integers. How the bijection goes is arbitrary, as ever.
Apr 16, 2014 at 16:56 comment added mildused So the purpose of 100i+10j+k+1 is to result all numbers from 1 to 1000 (later to be checked if prime). To do this, we use all the digits available in base 10, 0 to 9?
Apr 16, 2014 at 2:40 history edited m_goldberg CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Apr 16, 2014 at 2:24 history edited m_goldberg CC BY-SA 3.0
General clean-up
Apr 16, 2014 at 2:18 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackMma/status/456255287414882304
Apr 16, 2014 at 2:12 comment added Dr. belisarius Try Flatten@Table[100 i + 10 j + k + 1, {i, 0, 9}, {j, 0, 9}, {k, 0, 9}] and Flatten@Table[100 i + 10 j + k + 1, {i, 1, 10}, {j, 1, 10}, {k, 1, 10}]
Apr 16, 2014 at 2:08 comment added mildused Why did you range the i,j,k to only nine? Why should it not range to 10? Otherwise, it looks the same. Thanks so much.
Apr 16, 2014 at 1:58 comment added Dr. belisarius Try Graphics3D[Table[If[PrimeQ[100 i + 10 j + k + 1], Sphere[{i, j, k}, 1/2]], {i, 0, 9}, {j, 0, 9}, {k, 0, 9}]]
Apr 16, 2014 at 1:45 review First posts
Apr 16, 2014 at 2:25
Apr 16, 2014 at 1:41 comment added mildused Thank you for your speedy response. The prime numbers from 1 to 1000 is rather easy, although I would've used Select from Table OR Case from Table. The problem I am having is exactly the one you mentioned. Numbering the cells. Once I figure how to assign each coordinate to a specific number, I ought to be able to use Graphics3D and define Spheres at those coordinates. Also, I think the radius of the spheres is 1/2. Can somebody please confirm that?
Apr 16, 2014 at 1:37 comment added Dr. belisarius Prime /@ Range@PrimePi[1000] gives you the prime numbers ... now you should solve how to "number" the 3D cells from 1 to 1000 ...
Apr 16, 2014 at 1:35 history edited mildused CC BY-SA 3.0
added 159 characters in body
Apr 16, 2014 at 1:26 history asked mildused CC BY-SA 3.0