Timeline for Evaluate in Plot leads to function error
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2014 at 16:28 | vote | accept | Adrian | ||
| Jan 8, 2014 at 12:10 | comment | added | heropup | I have edited the code per your feedback. | |
| Jan 8, 2014 at 12:08 | history | edited | heropup | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2014 at 12:03 | comment | added | heropup |
If you want less granularity at the beginning, then use a smaller step size. It still runs faster. I can use a step value of 0.0001 and get about the same performance as you were getting with Plot[]. That is 100 times more fine than the example I gave you, with 9800 data points. However, I should caution that the x-axis labeling is incorrect. It shouldn't be hard to fix.
|
|
| Jan 8, 2014 at 11:58 | comment | added | Adrian | Thanks. Yes, it runs faster but at the expense of losing all the granularity when the function changes rapidly (which it does in the early part of this specific metric). I guess if there is no way to solve the unknown problem (of which the quantile error is a symptom) then I'll have to do this but it feels pretty unsatisfactory (and means the plot may miss some features). And thanks re the metric redefinition, I'll use that. | |
| Jan 8, 2014 at 11:47 | history | answered | heropup | CC BY-SA 3.0 |