Timeline for measure minimum distance of dots from edge
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2013 at 17:57 | comment | added | bill s | The values you find in the distance transform are the distances between every point and the boundary of the object. By doing the matrix multiplication, we zero out everything that isn't one of the points of interest (i.e., the dots). So the min over all the values that occur where the dots are is the min you are looking for. The 0.->100 is just to remove all the interior points from the min. | |
| Nov 5, 2013 at 17:49 | vote | accept | Thomas | ||
| Nov 5, 2013 at 17:35 | comment | added | Thomas | @bills If you compare the image of dots with above multiplication, then both looks same. Does the list of distances from above multiplication are the distance of each dots? | |
| Nov 5, 2013 at 3:05 | comment | added | bill s |
@belisarius -- the DistanceTransform is useful in a surprising number of situations.
|
|
| Nov 5, 2013 at 1:55 | comment | added | Dr. belisarius | I voted to close this one, now I am ashamed. Good one +1 | |
| Nov 5, 2013 at 0:46 | history | edited | bill s | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 26 characters in body
|
| Nov 5, 2013 at 0:30 | history | answered | bill s | CC BY-SA 3.0 |