Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 23, 2015 at 2:59 history edited J. M.'s missing motivation
edited tags
Aug 26, 2013 at 14:40 answer added Daniel Lichtblau timeline score: 7
Aug 26, 2013 at 13:42 comment added Karl Eichenhaus If you input the expression correctly, the series will be dependent on x. In addition, with a=1, b=2.5 the series will loss the effectiveness when x>10.5.
Aug 26, 2013 at 13:30 history edited Karl Eichenhaus CC BY-SA 3.0
added 5 characters in body
Aug 26, 2013 at 13:20 comment added Karl Eichenhaus BesselJ[1,a x]BesselJ[1,b x]==a b (x^2)/4*Sum[(-1)^n*(a x/2)^(2n)*Hypergeometric2F1[-n,-1-n,2,b^2/a^2]/(n!Pochhammer[2,n]),{n,0,Infinity}]. Yes, this is the correct expression which is just evaluated by me. I thought the omitting space between the parameters would not lead to the misunderstanding of the expression. Now you can observe the above-mentioned phenomenon. The expression has no problem. The problem is the numerical evaluation of it.
Aug 26, 2013 at 13:06 comment added Pankaj Sejwal so did u get what I got ? I have tried the same already.
Aug 26, 2013 at 6:24 comment added Pankaj Sejwal Hypergeometric2F1[-n,-1-n,2,b^2/a^2] has independent a,b but actually they are not independent in your supplied parameters, parameter is ax,bx it should be a x,b x.Formation of series is faulty, I suppose.
Aug 26, 2013 at 4:20 comment added Karl Eichenhaus @Blackbird: Thanks! The coefficient a*b*(x^2)/4 is surely irrelevant. The decisive factor of the convergence is inside the sum[...]. " If I take it as a b (x^2)/4..for all value of x I get 0.045857190997445", this is incorrect please check whether the factor (ax/2)^(2n) is missed.
Aug 25, 2013 at 9:00 comment added Pankaj Sejwal abx^2/4 is strange here and I think it doesn't affect your convergence.After putting values its a constant which does nothing to convergence or divergence of series. If I take it as a b (x^2)/4..for all value of x I get 0.045857190997445
S Aug 25, 2013 at 8:52 history edited halirutan CC BY-SA 3.0
improved formatting
S Aug 25, 2013 at 8:52 history suggested M6299 CC BY-SA 3.0
improved formatting
Aug 25, 2013 at 8:45 review First posts
Aug 25, 2013 at 8:57
Aug 25, 2013 at 8:37 review Suggested edits
Aug 25, 2013 at 8:52
Aug 25, 2013 at 8:28 history asked Karl Eichenhaus CC BY-SA 3.0