Timeline for Maximize finds solution outside the constraint
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12 at 15:41 | comment | added | Michael Seifert | That was a mistake on my part, trying to figure out how one would get the same results using the postfix notation. The command you used in your revised version is what I had in mind but failed to express correctly. | |
| Sep 12 at 14:22 | comment | added | Domen |
@MichaelSeifert, I've edited the answer to emphasize that. But I am not really sure what you mean by Maximize[... , 5] // N ...
|
|
| Sep 12 at 14:20 | history | edited | Domen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Add more explicit mention of second argument of N
|
| Sep 12 at 14:06 | comment | added | Michael Seifert |
Ah, I did miss that. So Maximize[... , 5] // N should yield the same result.
|
|
| Sep 12 at 12:58 | comment | added | Domen |
@MichaelSeifert, hmm, have you perhaps missed that there is a second argument: N[Maximize[...], 5], where 5 is the desired precision?
|
|
| Sep 12 at 11:47 | comment | added | Michael Seifert |
I would have thought that N[Maximize[...]] and Maximize[...] // N would do the same thing in Mathematica and yield the same results. Why don't they?
|
|
| Sep 11 at 12:37 | vote | accept | Carlos Santi Toledo | ||
| Sep 11 at 12:03 | history | edited | user64494 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Sep 11 at 11:08 | history | answered | Domen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |