Timeline for Troublesome output of summation's derivative
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10 at 13:53 | comment | added | FDP | Hi @rhermans, thank you very much for the suggestion. I have updated the question to fix the issues you pointed out and show that your solution handles the complex number problem. Yet, Kronecker deltas are still there, and I have no clue how to eliminate them and improve the readability of the solution. | |
| Jul 10 at 13:51 | history | edited | FDP | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 649 characters in body
|
| Jul 10 at 13:27 | history | edited | FDP | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 73 characters in body
|
| Jul 10 at 13:19 | comment | added | rhermans |
First, I see no reason to expect a simple closed form for that problem, given that you are not defining FFunc. Second, never use uppercase variable names, as you will likely use reserved symbols inadvertently, like you did using N. Change to n. Third, if all variables will always be Reals, then add to the assumptions _Symbol \[Element] Reals, as explained here. Fix that first and edit your question to update it to a question that acknowledges these basic issues.
|
|
| S Jul 10 at 9:20 | review | First questions | |||
| Jul 10 at 9:45 | |||||
| S Jul 10 at 9:20 | history | asked | FDP | CC BY-SA 4.0 |