Timeline for How do I use Mathematica as a vector drawing program?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:56 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathematica.stackexchange.com/ with https://mathematica.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Aug 13, 2013 at 6:15 | comment | added | Jens | I think Mathematica is a great tool for programmatic, algorithmic drawing. Manual drawing, not so much (too sluggish). This question is about something in-between the two extremes because we're asked to work with given shapes only. That makes it OK as a topic, I guess. It's just a little too open-ended for me... How about changing the title to omit "vector drawing program" and be more specific? E.g.,"Shape manipulation"... | |
Aug 12, 2013 at 23:05 | comment | added | m_goldberg | @SjoerdC.deVries. My first comment was made long before I down voted. But, you're right, I should have added the second comment when I down voted. Unfortunately, I didn't think of it at the time. | |
Aug 12, 2013 at 22:25 | comment | added | amr | besides aligning things in parallel, you can vector-edit just fine with the drawing menu (Ctrl+D) | |
Aug 12, 2013 at 15:24 | comment | added | Sjoerd C. de Vries | @m_goldberg It is often good to clarify your downvote in a comment so that the OP knows what to improve instead of letting him guess. Your first comment doesn't provide any clue at all about code. | |
Aug 12, 2013 at 15:20 | vote | accept | kornaros | ||
Aug 12, 2013 at 13:59 | comment | added | m_goldberg | @SjoerdC.deVries. I down voted because the post doesn't show any code, not because I think Mathematica is an inappropriate tool. | |
Aug 12, 2013 at 13:51 | answer | added | Kuba | timeline score: 5 | |
Aug 12, 2013 at 7:17 | answer | added | cormullion | timeline score: 5 | |
Aug 12, 2013 at 6:19 | comment | added | kornaros | I don't see the reason that one can do better drawing tasks outside Mathematica. Mathematica is for using mathematics! Sketchup use internally mathematical algorithms/models. Why then is not natural to ask someone if Mathematica support grouping, moving, rotating or positioning of shapes? | |
Aug 12, 2013 at 5:45 | comment | added | Sjoerd C. de Vries | While I agree that Mathematica is not the best the tool for drawing, I don't see why one would downvote this question for that reason. There could be many reasons for using Mathematica for this task, for instance because one needs the coordinates in a Mathematica centered coordinate system for further processing (calculating area, finding the best packing etc.). In the past, I have been using both the drawing tools as well as LocatorPane for quick and dirty jobs in this area and though perhaps clumsy it worked sufficiently well for my needs. | |
Aug 12, 2013 at 3:09 | history | edited | Verbeia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo in title fixed
|
Aug 12, 2013 at 1:44 | history | edited | m_goldberg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Aug 12, 2013 at 1:39 | comment | added | m_goldberg | I agree with Belisarius. Mathematica is not the tool for this job. Any of a number of good vector drawing programs would be better. However, some the things you want are available in graphics tools found on the Graphics menu. | |
Aug 12, 2013 at 1:24 | comment | added | Dr. belisarius | Perhaps Mma isn't the best tool for interior design sketchup.com/products/sketchup-make | |
Aug 12, 2013 at 0:35 | history | edited | kornaros | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 14 characters in body
|
Aug 12, 2013 at 0:28 | history | asked | kornaros | CC BY-SA 3.0 |