Skip to main content

Timeline for Problem with SetDelay [duplicate]

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 11 at 13:22 history closed xzczd
Roman
creidhne
Domen
bbgodfrey
Duplicate of Numerical optimization yields strange result with imaginary number
Mar 11 at 13:20 answer added Daniel Huber timeline score: 0
Mar 11 at 12:24 comment added blahblah @xzczd, I found a mistake in my program. That means this method works. Thank you!
Mar 11 at 12:01 comment added xzczd Why do you think so? How do you apply the methods therein?
Mar 11 at 12:00 comment added blahblah @xzczd, the question is with the same problem, but the answer doesn't work in my case
Mar 11 at 11:07 review Close votes
Mar 11 at 13:22
Mar 11 at 10:55 comment added Roman Off-topic, but: the answer will be 1 irrespective of the parameters $(b,c,d)$.
Mar 11 at 10:46 history edited blahblah CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 4 characters in body
Mar 11 at 10:46 comment added blahblah @Domen, yes you are right, but if I change to F[b_,c_,d_] := NIntegrate[DEV1 + DEV2, {a, 0, 1}] it still doesn't work. :( I corrected my question.
Mar 11 at 10:43 comment added Domen The error message is NIntegrate::itraw: Raw object 1 cannot be used as an iterator.. As you see in your code, you set a to 1, and then you want to integrate over this, e.g. $\int_0^1 (DEV1+DEV2) \; \rm d 1$. This does not make much sense, right? :) So what do you want to do with this a?
Mar 11 at 10:40 history asked blahblah CC BY-SA 4.0