Timeline for Mathematica performance on Mac
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
21 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 21, 2017 at 19:22 | answer | added | Itai Seggev | timeline score: 9 | |
Sep 28, 2016 at 0:48 | comment | added | Sander Heinsalu | Mathematica on Linux OpenSuse 13.1 was many times slower than on Windows XP on the same Dell D630 PC. Both starting up slow and running the code slowly. | |
May 10, 2016 at 19:38 | comment | added | Szabolcs | I noticed this too: I ran Mathematica directly on OS X, on Windows in VirtualBox and on Linux in VirtualBox. On the same hardware. Generally, Windows was a bit faster than OS X and Linux was a bit faster than Windows. | |
Dec 29, 2015 at 21:18 | comment | added | Shredderroy | I had exactly the same set-up on an early 2014 MacBook Pro, on which I ran Mathematica in OS X as well as on Windows 8.1. And I found exactly the same characteristics: Mathematica ran faster in Windows 8.1 than in OS X. | |
Dec 16, 2013 at 7:58 | comment | added | A.G. |
You may want to use SeedRandom to make sure you are working on the same matrices. On your a.b example I could observe variations of up to 20% on just 10 trials.
|
|
Aug 13, 2013 at 4:05 | comment | added | Hector | But I bet the graphs are prettier on Mac ;^) | |
Aug 5, 2013 at 11:45 | history | edited | Code Different | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
add info to the question
|
Aug 4, 2013 at 20:52 | comment | added | cormullion |
Why not run Needs["Benchmarking`"];Benchmark[] for a full comparison?
|
|
Aug 4, 2013 at 20:51 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackMma/status/364126490184523776 | ||
Aug 4, 2013 at 20:45 | comment | added | C. E.♦ | @Nasser It is, I've confirmed it. | |
Aug 4, 2013 at 19:42 | comment | added | Mr.Wizard | @Nasser Or what he said. :^) | |
Aug 4, 2013 at 19:42 | comment | added | Mr.Wizard |
I'm not on Mac so I can't test this, but I believe that on Windows Dot on packed reals is implemented as a fast Intel® Math Kernel Library call. I am guessing that on the Mac such a call isn't being used for some reason. Perhaps a driver or library is missing; perhaps the developers never bothered to implement it.
|
|
Aug 4, 2013 at 19:39 | history | edited | Code Different | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
rephrase question
|
S Aug 4, 2013 at 19:37 | history | suggested | M6299 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
MATLAB changed to Mathematica
|
Aug 4, 2013 at 19:33 | comment | added | Code Different | You guys are right. I'm did copy the code so messed up the function name. It's corrected now. | |
Aug 4, 2013 at 19:33 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Aug 4, 2013 at 19:37 | |||||
Aug 4, 2013 at 19:33 | history | edited | Code Different | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected the function name
|
Aug 4, 2013 at 19:31 | comment | added | Mr.Wizard |
To begin with the function name is RandomReal not RandomReals . Did you copy this code exactly?
|
|
Aug 4, 2013 at 19:29 | history | edited | Mr.Wizard |
edited tags
|
|
Aug 4, 2013 at 19:27 | review | First posts | |||
Aug 4, 2013 at 20:09 | |||||
Aug 4, 2013 at 19:10 | history | asked | Code Different | CC BY-SA 3.0 |