Skip to main content
deleted 73 characters in body
Source Link
E. Chan-López
  • 31.1k
  • 3
  • 29
  • 50

I add that AsymptoticDSolveValue calculates well the solution that DSolve doesn't detect:

AsymptoticDSolveValue[{ode, ic}, y[x], x -> 1]

(*-x*)

From the above, we can see that Daniel Huber's conclusion is correct.

I add that AsymptoticDSolveValue calculates well the solution that DSolve doesn't detect:

AsymptoticDSolveValue[{ode, ic}, y[x], x -> 1]

(*-x*)

From the above, we can see that Daniel Huber's conclusion is correct.

I add that AsymptoticDSolveValue calculates well the solution that DSolve doesn't detect:

AsymptoticDSolveValue[{ode, ic}, y[x], x -> 1]

(*-x*)
added 73 characters in body
Source Link
E. Chan-López
  • 31.1k
  • 3
  • 29
  • 50

I add that AsymptoticDSolveValue calculates well the solution that DSolve doesn't detect:

AsymptoticDSolveValue[{ode, ic}, y[x], x -> 1]

(*-x*)

From the above, we can see that Daniel Huber's conclusion is correct.

I add that AsymptoticDSolveValue calculates well the solution that DSolve doesn't detect:

AsymptoticDSolveValue[{ode, ic}, y[x], x -> 1]

(*-x*)

I add that AsymptoticDSolveValue calculates well the solution that DSolve doesn't detect:

AsymptoticDSolveValue[{ode, ic}, y[x], x -> 1]

(*-x*)

From the above, we can see that Daniel Huber's conclusion is correct.

Source Link
E. Chan-López
  • 31.1k
  • 3
  • 29
  • 50

I add that AsymptoticDSolveValue calculates well the solution that DSolve doesn't detect:

AsymptoticDSolveValue[{ode, ic}, y[x], x -> 1]

(*-x*)