Skip to main content
added 3 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
Artes
  • 57.9k
  • 13
  • 159
  • 247

I've come across an issue while using Wolfram MathematicaWolfram Mathematica that I don't quite understand.

Consider the following symbolic computation:

Clear[n, y, x];  
Sum[1/(n + y)^x, {n, 0, Infinity}]
 

Mathematica returns: "HurwitzZeta[x, y]"

HurwitzZeta[x, y]

However, when I plug in specific values (x = 1/3, y = 1)(x = 1/3, y = 1) to evaluate the sum:

x = 1/3; y = 1;  
Sum[1/(n + y)^x, {n, 0, Infinity}]

I get an error message: "Sum::div: Sum does not converge."

"Sum::div: Sum does not converge."

What confuses me is when I compute HurwitzZeta[1/3, 1] // NHurwitzZeta[1/3, 1] // N, it successfully returns a numerical value: -0.97336.

So, why does the SumSum function claim the series doesn't converge, but HurwitzZetaHurwitzZeta, which should be equivalent according to Mathematica'sMathematica's own symbolic computation, computes a numerical value without issue? Can anyone shed some light on this discrepancy or at least on what I am missing?

I've come across an issue while using Wolfram Mathematica that I don't quite understand.

Consider the following symbolic computation:

Clear[n, y, x]; Sum[1/(n + y)^x, {n, 0, Infinity}]
 

Mathematica returns: "HurwitzZeta[x, y]"

However, when I plug in specific values (x = 1/3, y = 1) to evaluate the sum:

x = 1/3; y = 1; Sum[1/(n + y)^x, {n, 0, Infinity}]

I get an error message: "Sum::div: Sum does not converge."

What confuses me is when I compute HurwitzZeta[1/3, 1] // N, it successfully returns a numerical value: -0.97336.

So, why does the Sum function claim the series doesn't converge, but HurwitzZeta, which should be equivalent according to Mathematica's own symbolic computation, computes a numerical value without issue? Can anyone shed some light on this discrepancy or at least on what I am missing?

I've come across an issue while using Wolfram Mathematica that I don't quite understand.

Consider the following symbolic computation:

Clear[n, y, x]; 
Sum[1/(n + y)^x, {n, 0, Infinity}]
HurwitzZeta[x, y]

However, when I plug in specific values (x = 1/3, y = 1) to evaluate the sum:

x = 1/3; y = 1;  
Sum[1/(n + y)^x, {n, 0, Infinity}]

I get an error message:

"Sum::div: Sum does not converge."

What confuses me is when I compute HurwitzZeta[1/3, 1] // N, it successfully returns a numerical value: -0.97336.

So, why does the Sum function claim the series doesn't converge, but HurwitzZeta, which should be equivalent according to Mathematica's own symbolic computation, computes a numerical value without issue? Can anyone shed some light on this discrepancy or at least on what I am missing?

Became Hot Network Question

I've come across an issue while using Wolfram Mathematica that I don't quite understand.

Consider the following symbolic computation:

Clear[n, y, x]; Sum[1/(n + y)^x, {n, 0, Infinity}]

Mathematica returns: "HurwitzZeta[x, y]"

However, when I plug in specific values (x = 1/3, y = 1) to evaluate the sum:

x = 1/3; y = 1; Sum[1/(n + y)^x, {n, 0, Infinity}]

I get an error message: "Sum::div: Sum does not converge."

What confuses me is when I compute HurwitzZeta[1/3, 1] // N, it successfully returns a numerical value:  1-0.082409227768647*10^1863597336.

So, why does the Sum function claim the series doesn't converge, but HurwitzZeta, which should be equivalent according to Mathematica's own symbolic computation, computes a numerical value without issue? Can anyone shed some light on this discrepancy or at least on what I am missing?

I've come across an issue while using Wolfram Mathematica that I don't quite understand.

Consider the following symbolic computation:

Clear[n, y, x]; Sum[1/(n + y)^x, {n, 0, Infinity}]

Mathematica returns: "HurwitzZeta[x, y]"

However, when I plug in specific values (x = 1/3, y = 1) to evaluate the sum:

x = 1/3; y = 1; Sum[1/(n + y)^x, {n, 0, Infinity}]

I get an error message: "Sum::div: Sum does not converge."

What confuses me is when I compute HurwitzZeta[1/3, 1] // N, it successfully returns a numerical value:  1.082409227768647*10^18635.

So, why does the Sum function claim the series doesn't converge, but HurwitzZeta, which should be equivalent according to Mathematica's own symbolic computation, computes a numerical value without issue? Can anyone shed some light on this discrepancy or at least on what I am missing?

I've come across an issue while using Wolfram Mathematica that I don't quite understand.

Consider the following symbolic computation:

Clear[n, y, x]; Sum[1/(n + y)^x, {n, 0, Infinity}]

Mathematica returns: "HurwitzZeta[x, y]"

However, when I plug in specific values (x = 1/3, y = 1) to evaluate the sum:

x = 1/3; y = 1; Sum[1/(n + y)^x, {n, 0, Infinity}]

I get an error message: "Sum::div: Sum does not converge."

What confuses me is when I compute HurwitzZeta[1/3, 1] // N, it successfully returns a numerical value: -0.97336.

So, why does the Sum function claim the series doesn't converge, but HurwitzZeta, which should be equivalent according to Mathematica's own symbolic computation, computes a numerical value without issue? Can anyone shed some light on this discrepancy or at least on what I am missing?

Added missing numerical value.
Source Link
JimB
  • 42.9k
  • 3
  • 51
  • 108

I've come across an issue while using Wolfram Mathematica that I don't quite understand.

Consider the following symbolic computation:

Clear[n, y, x]; Sum[1/(n + y)^x, {n, 0, Infinity}]

Mathematica returns: "HurwitzZeta[x, y]"

However, when I plug in specific values (x = 1/3, y = 1) to evaluate the sum:

x = 1/3; y = 1; Sum[1/(n + y)^x, {n, 0, Infinity}]

I get an error message: "Sum::div: Sum does not converge."

What confuses me is when I compute HurwitzZeta[1/3, 1] // N, it successfully returns a numerical value: 1.082409227768647*10^18635.

So, why does the Sum function claim the series doesn't converge, but HurwitzZeta, which should be equivalent according to Mathematica's own symbolic computation, computes a numerical value without issue? Can anyone shed some light on this discrepancy or at least on what I am missing?

I've come across an issue while using Wolfram Mathematica that I don't quite understand.

Consider the following symbolic computation:

Clear[n, y, x]; Sum[1/(n + y)^x, {n, 0, Infinity}]

Mathematica returns: "HurwitzZeta[x, y]"

However, when I plug in specific values (x = 1/3, y = 1) to evaluate the sum:

x = 1/3; y = 1; Sum[1/(n + y)^x, {n, 0, Infinity}]

I get an error message: "Sum::div: Sum does not converge."

What confuses me is when I compute HurwitzZeta[1/3, 1] // N, it successfully returns a numerical value:

So, why does the Sum function claim the series doesn't converge, but HurwitzZeta, which should be equivalent according to Mathematica's own symbolic computation, computes a numerical value without issue? Can anyone shed some light on this discrepancy or at least on what I am missing?

I've come across an issue while using Wolfram Mathematica that I don't quite understand.

Consider the following symbolic computation:

Clear[n, y, x]; Sum[1/(n + y)^x, {n, 0, Infinity}]

Mathematica returns: "HurwitzZeta[x, y]"

However, when I plug in specific values (x = 1/3, y = 1) to evaluate the sum:

x = 1/3; y = 1; Sum[1/(n + y)^x, {n, 0, Infinity}]

I get an error message: "Sum::div: Sum does not converge."

What confuses me is when I compute HurwitzZeta[1/3, 1] // N, it successfully returns a numerical value: 1.082409227768647*10^18635.

So, why does the Sum function claim the series doesn't converge, but HurwitzZeta, which should be equivalent according to Mathematica's own symbolic computation, computes a numerical value without issue? Can anyone shed some light on this discrepancy or at least on what I am missing?

Source Link
Loading