Timeline for Can the type 3 SS be obtained using the ANOVA function or an adaptation that is readily available in Mathematica?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2023 at 12:36 | comment | added | ubpdqn | @JimB agree different tools for different purposes. My R is rudimentary and rusty and I haven’t used RLink. Look forward to continuing to learn from answers…and thank you for supportive comment on meta post. | |
| Jul 6, 2023 at 12:26 | comment | added | JimB | @ubpdqn. No way! That functionality is far superior in R and SAS. | |
| Jul 6, 2023 at 12:11 | comment | added | ubpdqn | Very instructive. Are you writing Mathematica code for mixed models etc? +1 :) of course | |
| Jul 6, 2023 at 7:19 | comment | added | Joel | Thank you very much for your answer, I have marked it as the solution. | |
| Jul 6, 2023 at 7:15 | vote | accept | Joel | ||
| Jul 6, 2023 at 5:22 | comment | added | JimB |
And an editorial: Mathematica is great but it has only a relatively primitive set of features for LinearModelFit. For example, there is no automatic way to select the type of sum of squares (I, II, III, or IV), as there is only a single error term allowed (i.e., mixed models are not implemented), and no nice way to produce contrasts or linear combinations of parameters. All of those features can be programmed with Mathematica commands but that limits the number of folks able to do that correctly - even for those who know the statistical background.
|
|
| Jul 6, 2023 at 5:14 | history | answered | JimB | CC BY-SA 4.0 |