Timeline for Vary the thickness of a plotted function
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2013 at 13:19 | comment | added | halirutan | @MichaelE2 Nice, it works on OSX but does absolutely nothing in Linux... as usual. | |
| Jul 7, 2013 at 13:17 | comment | added | Michael E2 |
Yes, put the Method with the Graphics. (See this.) I figured that about the double calculation, and it does help the explanation be very clear. Still, the next person might want to make it more efficient.
|
|
| Jul 7, 2013 at 13:06 | comment | added | halirutan |
@MichaelE2 I was aware of the double calculation but left it in order to keep the explanations simple. Where do I have to put the Method option? Because on my Linux box I don't see any difference when I append it as option to Graphics.
|
|
| Jul 7, 2013 at 12:56 | comment | added | Michael E2 |
A nice explanation. (+1) You might add Method -> {"TransparentPolygonMesh" -> True} to get rid of the Moiré effect. A slight criticism: The corners of the quadrilaterals are calculated twice, except at the ends.
|
|
| Jul 7, 2013 at 7:23 | comment | added | Kuba | @rm-rf If this is related then mine is a duplicate of that. But believe me, I haven't seen this Q&A before :) | |
| Jul 7, 2013 at 4:51 | comment | added | rm -rf♦ | Related: mathematica.stackexchange.com/a/13376/5 | |
| Jul 7, 2013 at 2:19 | history | answered | halirutan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |