Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 13, 2023 at 2:53 history rollback J. M.'s missing motivation
Rollback to Revision 5
Feb 12, 2023 at 9:45 history edited user64494 CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 1 character in body
Feb 12, 2023 at 9:44 comment added user64494 @yarchik: I changed my mind after your edit.
Feb 11, 2023 at 19:31 comment added user64494 I have strong doubts about " but can be evaluated to arbitrary numerical precision. 4.40045471404601150487323349114114025609858633366736911333235058125968\ 8407614606852636185052837712051303716016786758083926093099371567866549\ 2606639295944504935130060271113944852033606388454773344568577".
Feb 11, 2023 at 7:36 history edited yarchik CC BY-SA 4.0
Response added
Feb 10, 2023 at 17:17 comment added kirma Heh, clearly I didn't pay much attention as I only now noticed that you have used CylindricalDecomposition in association with numeric integration... yes, it comes handy on these sort of problems in various forms. :)
Feb 10, 2023 at 8:47 comment added user64494 +1. Thank you. You wrote "The final result can also be reduced to 1D integral...". Can you kindly present that integral in your answer? TIA. What does CylindrigalDecomposition do?
Feb 9, 2023 at 22:42 comment added Bob Hanlon Using ResourceFunction["RadicalDenest"] the expression can be simplified to (-(4/3))*(-2 - 10*Sqrt[2] + 6*Sqrt[3] + Sqrt[6])
Feb 9, 2023 at 21:16 history edited yarchik CC BY-SA 4.0
added 177 characters in body
Feb 9, 2023 at 21:10 history edited yarchik CC BY-SA 4.0
added 177 characters in body
Feb 9, 2023 at 21:04 history edited yarchik CC BY-SA 4.0
added 177 characters in body
Feb 9, 2023 at 20:43 history answered yarchik CC BY-SA 4.0