Timeline for Efficiently evaluating a held expression directly from a list
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2018 at 6:09 | history | edited | J. M.'s missing motivation♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:56 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathematica.stackexchange.com/ with https://mathematica.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 31, 2012 at 20:02 | history | edited | rm -rf♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 13 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Mar 14, 2012 at 2:09 | vote | accept | mmorris | ||
| Mar 10, 2012 at 3:14 | history | edited | mmorris | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 8 characters in body
|
| Mar 10, 2012 at 2:34 | history | edited | mmorris | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1126 characters in body
|
| Mar 9, 2012 at 16:21 | comment | added | Leonid Shifrin | Within SO Mathematica tag, only programming questions were on topic, strictly speaking. Also, it was just one tag within a much larger SO infrastructure. The purpose of the two sites is similar, but they are different sites in terms of infrastructure, moderation, rules, etc. You can read discussions which were accompanying the SE Mathematica proposal on Area51, to better see the difference - it was extensively discussed there. | |
| Mar 9, 2012 at 15:53 | comment | added | mmorris | @LeonidShifrin Hmmmm, I am trying to parse you statement, "SO and Mathematica SE are different sites". Sites as in databases, but not general purpose? I thought, please correct me if I am wrong (< 1 year on SO and < 1 moth here), SO is general purpose for questions(discussions) on topics that don't have a specialized SE site. In theory the purpose of SO w/[mathematica] == Mathematica SE, where Mathematica SE is specific to the Mathematica domain which allows for categorization via tags within that domain. | |
| Mar 9, 2012 at 15:28 | comment | added | Leonid Shifrin | There is no reason to be sorry. It is not always easy to find what you need, and in any case the question is not duplicate because SO and Mathematica SE are different sites. Eventually some questions get migrated from SO to this site. Right now, this site is by far the most active Mathematica resource on SE, while the SO Mathematica tag remains mostly a repository of some already answered questions. | |
| Mar 9, 2012 at 14:57 | comment | added | mmorris | @LeonidShifrin Sorry about the duplicate post. Is there away to search stackoveflow and mathematica.se at the same time? Or are there plans to move/link the Mathematica posts on stackoverflow to mathematica.se? While having a separate mathematica.se makes sense it seems. However having two sites for Mathematica only increases the likely hood of future duplicate questions. | |
| Mar 9, 2012 at 12:03 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackMma/status/178088628684210176 | ||
| Mar 9, 2012 at 11:16 | history | edited | Leonid Shifrin |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 9, 2012 at 10:40 | comment | added | Leonid Shifrin | Related question: stackoverflow.com/questions/6254538/… | |
| Mar 9, 2012 at 10:32 | answer | added | Leonid Shifrin | timeline score: 7 | |
| Mar 9, 2012 at 8:36 | answer | added | celtschk | timeline score: 7 | |
| Mar 9, 2012 at 4:26 | history | asked | mmorris | CC BY-SA 3.0 |