Timeline for How did DSolve solve for the constants of integrations in this ode?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2022 at 16:25 | history | edited | Michael E2 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed typo
|
| Jul 30, 2022 at 6:06 | comment | added | Nasser | Yes, looking more at your trace, I think that is similar to what I did by hand also. I just have to figure how to code it myself. sometimes it is easier to do something by hand than on the computer. I need to learn how to use Trace more. I am not good at it. I know you are good with Traces. | |
| Jul 30, 2022 at 5:59 | comment | added | Nasser | Thanks. I just figured also how to solve it by hand. I think it might be similar to what you show. I just need to type the latex and post it at the end of my question so you can check if it looks OK. | |
| Jul 30, 2022 at 5:57 | vote | accept | Nasser | ||
| Jul 30, 2022 at 5:37 | comment | added | Michael E2 | @Nasser I'm meant to be doing something else, but tracing Solve[] wasn't too bad. See the update I knew the original answer was not what you were looking for, but it was easy to try. | |
| Jul 30, 2022 at 5:36 | history | edited | Michael E2 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Update
|
| Jul 30, 2022 at 5:09 | comment | added | Nasser | Thanks. I have feeling DSolve must have used more generic method, as it has to work for any other input? Otherwise, how would it know to do these transformation? I am also not sure why using these transformations made it solve it. I tried to use Wolfram alpha to see the steps, but it did not show these. | |
| Jul 30, 2022 at 4:38 | history | answered | Michael E2 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |