Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 4, 2022 at 20:11 history edited J. M.'s missing motivation
edited tags
Jan 4, 2022 at 2:09 history became hot network question
Jan 3, 2022 at 20:48 comment added ExtremOPS @Domen: thank you very much; also to the others.Your help was very fast and solved/answered my question.
Jan 3, 2022 at 20:47 vote accept ExtremOPS
Jan 3, 2022 at 18:44 answer added Michael E2 timeline score: 5
Jan 3, 2022 at 18:29 comment added Domen Therefore, increase the precision of the boundary in the integration: Integrate[J[z, (1 + I)*10^(-8), 0, 1, 0], {z, 1`50, 1.1`50}]. This yields -0.0333333329833333333333333 - 3.499999970577778*10^-10 I.
Jan 3, 2022 at 18:22 comment added Domen It probably has to do with the inadequate precision due to extremely large/small terms in the integral. Take a look at the analytic integral (int = Integrate[J[z, (1 + I)*10^(-8), 0, 1, 0], z]) and its plot Plot[Evaluate@Re@int, {z, .9, 1.2}]. The plot looks much nices if you increase the precision Plot[Evaluate@Re@int, {z, .9, 1.2}, WorkingPrecision -> 30].
Jan 3, 2022 at 18:20 comment added ExtremOPS Thank you @bbgodfrey. I changed it. Also, I cannot use the $$ formatting to make the math nicer to view.
Jan 3, 2022 at 18:16 history edited ExtremOPS CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1 character in body
Jan 3, 2022 at 18:16 comment added bbgodfrey Integrate[J[z, (1+I) * 10^(-8), 0, 1 0], {z, 1, 1.1}]; should be Integrate[J[z, (1+I) * 10^(-8), 0, 1, 0], {z, 1, 1.1}];
Jan 3, 2022 at 18:10 history edited ExtremOPS CC BY-SA 4.0
added 2061 characters in body
S Jan 3, 2022 at 18:03 review First questions
Jan 3, 2022 at 18:39
S Jan 3, 2022 at 18:03 history asked ExtremOPS CC BY-SA 4.0