Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 4, 2017 at 14:37 vote accept William Kennerly
Mar 4, 2017 at 14:37 vote accept William Kennerly
Mar 4, 2017 at 14:37
Mar 4, 2017 at 14:36 vote accept William Kennerly
Mar 4, 2017 at 14:37
Mar 26, 2012 at 23:43 history edited rm -rf CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 269 characters in body; edited title
Mar 7, 2012 at 0:36 vote accept William Kennerly
Mar 4, 2017 at 14:36
Mar 7, 2012 at 0:36 answer added William Kennerly timeline score: 8
Mar 5, 2012 at 7:45 vote accept William Kennerly
Mar 5, 2012 at 7:46
Mar 5, 2012 at 7:45 vote accept William Kennerly
Mar 5, 2012 at 7:45
Mar 5, 2012 at 3:07 answer added Artes timeline score: 12
Mar 5, 2012 at 2:10 history edited William Kennerly CC BY-SA 3.0
(added an assumption line which may be useful to state explicitly)
Mar 5, 2012 at 0:03 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackMma/status/176457779932958720
Mar 4, 2012 at 23:04 answer added Verbeia timeline score: 5
Mar 4, 2012 at 22:54 comment added Verbeia You don't need the //N for matrixB: there is an analytical solution. If the highest power of the eigenvalues for matrixA is higher than those for matrixB, they won't be "as simple".
Mar 4, 2012 at 22:37 history asked William Kennerly CC BY-SA 3.0