Timeline for How do I simplify the equilibrium point to this simplified expression?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2021 at 21:15 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Nov 15, 2021 at 19:23 | answer | added | Chris K | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 15, 2021 at 16:56 | vote | accept | Math | ||
| Nov 15, 2021 at 16:37 | answer | added | Bob Hanlon | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 15, 2021 at 14:57 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 17, 2021 at 7:56 | |||||
| Nov 15, 2021 at 14:26 | history | edited | Math | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 8507 characters in body
|
| Nov 15, 2021 at 14:25 | comment | added | Math | @rhermans You don't require the link to answer the question since I edited the question. Let me further edit it. Please have a look now. I linked the paper as a reference in case one asked "how did you get this simplified expression?" | |
| Nov 15, 2021 at 13:54 | comment | added | Math | It isn't a difficult task to install the package to be honest. You just copy, paste and shift+ enter. All I ask is for example why is i2, obtained from our equilibrium point equal to $\frac{b_3}{p_1} j$? What simplification can we do to achieve this result? | |
| Nov 15, 2021 at 13:51 | comment | added | Syed | The situation has almost not changed. Now the respondents are being asked to install and understand the workings of a package related to the scientific paper. Maybe someone who has prior experience with this package would take up this question. You will have to wait and see. Why not contact the author of the paper directly? Best of luck. | |
| Nov 15, 2021 at 13:14 | history | edited | Math | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 51 characters in body
|
| Nov 15, 2021 at 13:03 | history | edited | Math | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 8 characters in body
|
| Nov 15, 2021 at 12:58 | comment | added | Math | @Syed I edited the question. | |
| Nov 15, 2021 at 12:58 | history | edited | Math | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1006 characters in body
|
| Nov 15, 2021 at 12:52 | comment | added | Syed | Is this a question about Mathematica? or the Wolfram Language? If you include the points (or representative data) and the Mma code that you have tried out so far for the simplification that you have alluded to, then this question will likely be considered valid and on-topic given that you can also describe where you are having difficulty. As posed, this question is asking the potential respondents to read a scientific paper. I would request you to edit your post further. | |
| Nov 15, 2021 at 12:44 | history | edited | Math |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 15, 2021 at 12:33 | history | asked | Math | CC BY-SA 4.0 |