Timeline for Fokker Planck Equation in Mathematica giving weird solution
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2021 at 11:59 | comment | added | Alex Trounev | @titanium Gaussian distribution defined on $-\infty <x<\infty$. It is not periodic function on $0\le x\le 2 \pi$ | |
| Jun 17, 2021 at 22:29 | comment | added | titanium | Thanks for catching that. I corrected the problem. My point was after running the code for long enough, the distribution of p[x,100] should be a Gaussian distribution which integrates to 1 in the range of 0, 2Pi. This is because p is the probability density. At the moment I cannot recover this. | |
| Jun 17, 2021 at 22:26 | comment | added | SuperCiocia | Well it's a diffusion equation, the width is supposed to get larger. Also your equation does not have a $P$ on the $\alpha$ term, but your Mathematica code does? | |
| Jun 17, 2021 at 22:18 | comment | added | titanium | Even if I do so, plot of p[x, 100] looks really weird; its amplitude is way too small. | |
| Jun 17, 2021 at 22:11 | history | answered | SuperCiocia | CC BY-SA 4.0 |