Timeline for Integral of a function defined with a loop
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 2, 2021 at 9:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackMma/status/1345293768518471680 | ||
Dec 27, 2020 at 15:58 | history | edited | Glib Verovkin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
Dec 27, 2020 at 15:50 | comment | added | Glib Verovkin |
The idea is that g is a function defined exactly with a loop. In my research I`m dealing with some counting stochastic process, which cannot be defined otherwise than a sum of random variables upto certain moment. Since stating the whole problem would have been rigorous, I have asked this more general question in order to apply obtained results later in my work.
|
|
Dec 27, 2020 at 15:46 | history | edited | Glib Verovkin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 35 characters in body
|
Dec 27, 2020 at 3:18 | comment | added | Greg Martin |
Is there a reason you don't want to simply define g[t_] := Floor[t] (Floor[t] + 1) / 2 ?
|
|
Dec 26, 2020 at 21:39 | history | became hot network question | |||
Dec 26, 2020 at 17:32 | history | edited | MarcoB | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Formatted code, restructured text
|
Dec 26, 2020 at 14:44 | answer | added | Bob Hanlon | timeline score: 7 | |
Dec 26, 2020 at 14:27 | review | Close votes | |||
Dec 27, 2020 at 17:38 | |||||
Dec 26, 2020 at 14:05 | comment | added | flinty |
Use g[t_?NumericQ] := ... instead, then do Remove["Global`*"] and re-evaluate it. See here for other cases where NumericQ is needed.
|
|
Dec 26, 2020 at 13:35 | review | First posts | |||
Dec 26, 2020 at 13:37 | |||||
Dec 26, 2020 at 13:35 | history | asked | Glib Verovkin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |