Timeline for Error using FEM package
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2020 at 13:17 | comment | added | user21 |
@DiegoMagela, in that case the equations can not be simplified as easy as in the 45 case. Try Simplify in stead of FullSimplify and see if that also helps.
|
|
| Apr 14, 2020 at 13:07 | comment | added | Ponyboy Curtis | It works like a charm. Thank you. For others angles, for instance 35 degree, it is taking too long to evaluate, while using your code for 45 degree is very fast. Do you know the reason? | |
| Apr 14, 2020 at 13:04 | vote | accept | Ponyboy Curtis | ||
| Apr 14, 2020 at 12:50 | comment | added | user21 | @DiegoMagela I dumped the code in the post. | |
| Apr 14, 2020 at 12:49 | history | edited | user21 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3759 characters in body
|
| Apr 14, 2020 at 12:33 | comment | added | user21 |
@DiegoMagela Make sure the PDE you put into FullSimplify are all rational numbers. In other words no reals!
|
|
| Apr 14, 2020 at 12:20 | comment | added | Ponyboy Curtis |
I did it and it is not working yet. I'm getting division-by-zero. Did you change my code and run it? Only the FullSimplify[PDEs] took 30+ min in my PC. Is it that time of computing normal?
|
|
| Apr 14, 2020 at 7:00 | history | answered | user21 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |