Skip to main content

Timeline for How to improve `FindDistribution`?

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 14, 2020 at 17:10 comment added მამუკა ჯიბლაძე I see, thanks. I do not see though what exactly makes datasets chosen by me unrealistic.
Apr 14, 2020 at 16:45 comment added JimB I mean "unrealistic", "contrived", "lacking any practical use", and "likely useless". But I certainly could be wrong. However, there's no indication in the question as to what real-world problem is to be solved with the code you present. FindDistribution does find distributions and parameters but without a method to estimate measures of precision it's not doing a complete and desirable job.
Apr 14, 2020 at 9:21 comment added მამუკა ჯიბლაძე Sorry, I cannot understand what do you mean by "almost zero real datasets", could you please explain this a little bit more?
Apr 13, 2020 at 23:09 history edited JimB CC BY-SA 4.0
Added in blurb about target functions and the log of the likelihood.
Apr 13, 2020 at 15:57 comment added მამუკა ჯიბლაძე Well the sample size increases exponentially, so one would express increasing accuracy - which is not the case. I chose RandomSample to have frequencies exactly equal to those derived from probabilities
Apr 13, 2020 at 15:55 comment added JimB Thanks, the additional explanation is helpful. But you probably want RandomChoice rather than RandomSample as the former samples with replacement and the latter samples without replacement (hence you just get a rearrangement of the numbers). But in any event you're only getting a single sample with a small sample size. There is going to be considerable variability that is inherent and not the fault of FindDistribution.
Apr 13, 2020 at 15:45 comment added მამუკა ჯიბლაძე Sorry for misunderstanding - I've provided additional explanations in the question. I believe in this case BinomialDistribution[3,0.5] would be a better guess, no?
Apr 13, 2020 at 14:38 history answered JimB CC BY-SA 4.0