Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 20, 2019 at 8:35 vote accept user91411
Dec 19, 2019 at 10:08 comment added bbgodfrey Evaluating Chop[s /. vals] with the values of b and c interchanged yields the same numerical value given in my answer above. The same is true, if b and c are interchanged in the numerical integration. This is true for every set of random values I have tried..
Dec 19, 2019 at 9:34 comment added user91411 If the ordering makes no difference, should not the final expression for the integral be symmetric under any permutation of $a, \, b,\, c$ ? Because the integrand has already an exchange symmetry for $a,\, b, \, c$. And yes I meant 3.131 problem #2.
Dec 19, 2019 at 1:22 comment added bbgodfrey @user91411 I am confident that the order of a, b, c makes no difference in 3.131 #1. Do you mean 3.13#2 when referring to "the second problem above"?
Dec 12, 2019 at 9:34 comment added user91411 Thanks a lot for the explanation. I feel the relative order of a, b, c must not be overlooked because the integrand has branch cuts. I still don't quite get why we should not get the same answer without having to make the substitution $b\rightarrow c, \,\, c \rightarrow b$. Have you tried to the verify the second problem above ? I ran into similar problem there. Mathematica integrates the second expression alright but the first argument of $F$ turns out to be $\gamma$ instead of $\beta$.
Dec 11, 2019 at 18:34 history edited bbgodfrey CC BY-SA 4.0
improved format
Dec 11, 2019 at 17:35 history edited bbgodfrey CC BY-SA 4.0
Major rewrite, taking account of different definitions of F
Dec 11, 2019 at 16:28 history edited bbgodfrey CC BY-SA 4.0
provided more recent citation
Dec 11, 2019 at 16:08 history edited bbgodfrey CC BY-SA 4.0
fixed typo
Dec 11, 2019 at 16:01 history answered bbgodfrey CC BY-SA 4.0